From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www381.your-server.de ([78.46.137.84]:44573 "EHLO www381.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751165AbcDZMB1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 08:01:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: tmp006: Set correct iio name To: Yong Li References: <1461296584-11918-1-git-send-email-sdliyong@gmail.com> <43150fbd-37ac-2d51-dd87-f41670417b96@kernel.org> <571E854A.90404@gmail.com> <7621197a-95ed-239e-8baa-83014bc27a26@kernel.org> <571F49B0.4060407@metafoo.de> Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Crestez Dan Leonard , knaack.h@gmx.de, Peter Meerwald-Stadler , =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Koz=c5=82owski?= , mranostay@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lars-Peter Clausen Message-ID: <571F588D.3010800@metafoo.de> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:01:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 04/26/2016 01:47 PM, Yong Li wrote: > Thanks for your mails. Just FYI, we are testing this tmp006 sensor on > our system. and our application framework is using these device names, > so I submitted this patch. Your patch is certainly correct. But the problem is, or rather the question is, will this break any existing applications that rely on the wrong behavior? - Lars