From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Cc: Varun.Swara@arm.com, Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: xen/arm: Assertion 'timer->status >= TIMER_STATUS_inactive' failed at timer.c:279
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:05:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <571FADFE.10500@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461692950.3525.71.camel@citrix.com>
On 26/04/16 18:49, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 15:25 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Dario,
[...]
> commit eca4d65fb67a71c0f6563aafbfdd68e566c53c32
> Author: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> Date: Tue Apr 26 17:42:36 2016 +0200
>
> xen: sched: fix killing an uninitialized timer in free_pdata.
>
> commit 64269d9365 "sched: implement .init_pdata in Credit,
> Credit2 and RTDS" helped fixing Credit2 runqueues, and
> the races we had in switching scheduler for pCPUs, but
> introduced another issue. In fact, if CPU bringup fails
> during __cpu_up() (and, more precisely, after CPU_UP_PREPARE,
> but before CPU_STARTING) the CPU_UP_CANCELED notifier
> would be executed, which calls the free_pdata hook.
>
> Such hook does two things: (1) undo the initialization
> done inside the init_pdata hook; (2) free the memory
> allocated by the alloc_pdata hook.
>
> However, in the failure path just described, it is possible
> that only alloc_pdata has really been called, which is
> potentially and issue (depending on what actually happens
> inside the implementation of free_pdata).
>
> In fact, for Credit1 (the only scheduler that actually
> allocates per-pCPU data), this result in calling kill_timer()
> on a timer that had not yet been initialized, which causes
> the following:
>
> (XEN) Xen call trace:
> (XEN) [<000000000022e304>] timer.c#active_timer+0x8/0x24 (PC)
> (XEN) [<000000000022f624>] kill_timer+0x108/0x2e0 (LR)
> (XEN) [<00000000002208c0>] sched_credit.c#csched_free_pdata+0xd8/0x114
> (XEN) [<0000000000227a18>] schedule.c#cpu_schedule_callback+0xc0/0x12c
> (XEN) [<0000000000219944>] notifier_call_chain+0x78/0x9c
> (XEN) [<00000000002015fc>] cpu_up+0x104/0x130
> (XEN) [<000000000028f7c0>] start_xen+0xaf8/0xce0
> (XEN) [<00000000810021d8>] 00000000810021d8
> (XEN)
> (XEN)
> (XEN) ****************************************
> (XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
> (XEN) Assertion 'timer->status >= TIMER_STATUS_inactive' failed at timer.c:279
> (XEN) ****************************************
>
> Solve this by making the scheduler hooks API symmetric again,
> i.e., by adding an deinit_pdata hook and making it responsible
> of undoing what init_pdata did, rather than asking to free_pdata
> to do everything.
>
> This is cleaner and, in the case at hand, makes it possible to
> only call free_pdata, which is the right thing to do, as only
> allocation and no initialization was performed.
>
> Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> ---
> Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> Cc: Varun.Swara@arm.com
> Cc: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Thank you for the patch. It fixes the bug when secondary CPUs fail to
come online on the Foundation Model:
Tested-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-26 14:25 xen/arm: Assertion 'timer->status >= TIMER_STATUS_inactive' failed at timer.c:279 Julien Grall
2016-04-26 17:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-26 18:05 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-04-27 13:43 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-27 14:05 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-04-27 14:29 ` George Dunlap
2016-05-03 13:03 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-03 13:20 ` George Dunlap
2016-05-03 13:22 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-03 13:23 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-03 21:52 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=571FADFE.10500@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=Varun.Swara@arm.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.