All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor common engine setup
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:10:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <572227FE.7090806@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461851222-20557-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 28/04/16 14:47, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Move all of the constant assignments up front and into a common
> function. This is primarily to ensure the backpointers are set as early
> as possible for later use during initialisation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> I'm not too happy about using the function parameters with lots of
> similar types, very easy to muddle them up. I'm sending this all because
> it places one initialiser in a common location rather than per-engine!
> -Chris
>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 874c2515f9d4..a4a4f8eaf000 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1921,8 +1921,7 @@ void intel_logical_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   }
>
>   static void
> -logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct drm_device *dev,
> -			    struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   {
>   	/* Default vfuncs which can be overriden by each engine. */
>   	engine->init_hw = gen8_init_common_ring;
> @@ -1933,7 +1932,7 @@ logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct drm_device *dev,
>   	engine->emit_bb_start = gen8_emit_bb_start;
>   	engine->get_seqno = gen8_get_seqno;
>   	engine->set_seqno = gen8_set_seqno;
> -	if (IS_BXT_REVID(dev, 0, BXT_REVID_A1)) {
> +	if (IS_BXT_REVID(engine->dev, 0, BXT_REVID_A1)) {

This must have been hard to swallow. ;D

>   		engine->irq_seqno_barrier = bxt_a_seqno_barrier;
>   		engine->set_seqno = bxt_a_set_seqno;
>   	}
> @@ -1944,6 +1943,7 @@ logical_ring_default_irqs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, unsigned shift)
>   {
>   	engine->irq_enable_mask = GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT << shift;
>   	engine->irq_keep_mask = GT_CONTEXT_SWITCH_INTERRUPT << shift;
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&engine->irq_queue);
>   }
>
>   static int
> @@ -1964,31 +1964,28 @@ lrc_setup_hws(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> -static int
> -logical_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +static struct intel_engine_cs *
> +logical_ring_setup(struct drm_device *dev, int id,

enum intel_engine_id id

> +		   const char *name,
> +		   unsigned exec_id,
> +		   unsigned guc_id,

If guc_if was an enum it could even be typesafe here. Structure for 
parameters is probably an overkill.Don't know.

> +		   unsigned mmio_base,

This is u32 elsewhere I think.

> +		   unsigned irq)

irq_shift would be OK.

>   {
>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> -	struct intel_context *dctx = dev_priv->kernel_context;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = &dev_priv->engine[id];
>   	enum forcewake_domains fw_domains;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	/* Intentionally left blank. */
> -	engine->buffer = NULL;
>
>   	engine->dev = dev;

Setting engine->dev was last in sequence before and now it is ahead of 
lot of other things. I am not sure how important that was and if it 
would cause any trouble now? Especially since using engine->dev for 
intel_ring_initialized is so terribly annoying and bites unexpectedly.

> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->active_list);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->request_list);
> -	i915_gem_batch_pool_init(dev, &engine->batch_pool);
> -	init_waitqueue_head(&engine->irq_queue);
> -
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->buffers);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->execlist_queue);
> -	spin_lock_init(&engine->execlist_lock);
>
> -	tasklet_init(&engine->irq_tasklet,
> -		     intel_lrc_irq_handler, (unsigned long)engine);
> +	engine->name = name,
> +	engine->id = id;
> +	engine->exec_id = exec_id;
> +	engine->guc_id = guc_id;
> +	engine->mmio_base = mmio_base;
>
> -	logical_ring_init_platform_invariants(engine);
> +	/* Intentionally left blank. */
> +	engine->buffer = NULL;
>
>   	fw_domains = intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(dev_priv,
>   						    RING_ELSP(engine),
> @@ -2004,6 +2001,31 @@ logical_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>
>   	engine->fw_domains = fw_domains;
>
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->active_list);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->request_list);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->buffers);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&engine->execlist_queue);
> +	spin_lock_init(&engine->execlist_lock);
> +
> +	tasklet_init(&engine->irq_tasklet,
> +		     intel_lrc_irq_handler, (unsigned long)engine);
> +
> +	logical_ring_init_platform_invariants(engine);
> +	logical_ring_default_vfuncs(engine);
> +	logical_ring_default_irqs(engine, irq);
> +
> +	intel_engine_init_hangcheck(engine);
> +	i915_gem_batch_pool_init(engine->dev, &engine->batch_pool);
> +
> +	return engine;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +logical_ring_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> +{
> +	struct intel_context *dctx = to_i915(engine->dev)->kernel_context;
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	ret = i915_cmd_parser_init_ring(engine);
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto error;
> @@ -2036,22 +2058,17 @@ error:
>
>   static int logical_render_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = &dev_priv->engine[RCS];
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>   	int ret;
>
> -	engine->name = "render ring";
> -	engine->id = RCS;
> -	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_RENDER;
> -	engine->guc_id = GUC_RENDER_ENGINE;
> -	engine->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE;
> -
> -	logical_ring_default_irqs(engine, GEN8_RCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
> +	engine = logical_ring_setup(dev, RCS, "render ring",
> +				    I915_EXEC_RENDER,
> +				    GUC_RENDER_ENGINE,
> +				    RENDER_RING_BASE,
> +				    GEN8_RCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
>   	if (HAS_L3_DPF(dev))
>   		engine->irq_keep_mask |= GT_RENDER_L3_PARITY_ERROR_INTERRUPT;
>
> -	logical_ring_default_vfuncs(dev, engine);
> -
>   	/* Override some for render ring. */
>   	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
>   		engine->init_hw = gen9_init_render_ring;
> @@ -2062,8 +2079,6 @@ static int logical_render_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	engine->emit_flush = gen8_emit_flush_render;
>   	engine->emit_request = gen8_emit_request_render;
>
> -	engine->dev = dev;
> -
>   	ret = intel_init_pipe_control(engine);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
> @@ -2079,7 +2094,7 @@ static int logical_render_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   			  ret);
>   	}
>
> -	ret = logical_ring_init(dev, engine);
> +	ret = logical_ring_init(engine);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		lrc_destroy_wa_ctx_obj(engine);
>   	}
> @@ -2089,70 +2104,54 @@ static int logical_render_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>
>   static int logical_bsd_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = &dev_priv->engine[VCS];
> -
> -	engine->name = "bsd ring";
> -	engine->id = VCS;
> -	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BSD;
> -	engine->guc_id = GUC_VIDEO_ENGINE;
> -	engine->mmio_base = GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>
> -	logical_ring_default_irqs(engine, GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT);
> -	logical_ring_default_vfuncs(dev, engine);
> +	engine = logical_ring_setup(dev, VCS, "bsd ring",
> +				    I915_EXEC_BSD,
> +				    GUC_VIDEO_ENGINE,
> +				    GEN6_BSD_RING_BASE,
> +				    GEN8_VCS1_IRQ_SHIFT);
>
> -	return logical_ring_init(dev, engine);
> +	return logical_ring_init(engine);
>   }
>
>   static int logical_bsd2_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = &dev_priv->engine[VCS2];
> -
> -	engine->name = "bsd2 ring";
> -	engine->id = VCS2;
> -	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BSD;
> -	engine->guc_id = GUC_VIDEO_ENGINE2;
> -	engine->mmio_base = GEN8_BSD2_RING_BASE;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>
> -	logical_ring_default_irqs(engine, GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT);
> -	logical_ring_default_vfuncs(dev, engine);
> +	engine = logical_ring_setup(dev, VCS2, "bsd2 ring",
> +				    I915_EXEC_BSD,
> +				    GUC_VIDEO_ENGINE2,
> +				    GEN8_BSD2_RING_BASE,
> +				    GEN8_VCS2_IRQ_SHIFT);
>
> -	return logical_ring_init(dev, engine);
> +	return logical_ring_init(engine);
>   }
>
>   static int logical_blt_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = &dev_priv->engine[BCS];
> -
> -	engine->name = "blitter ring";
> -	engine->id = BCS;
> -	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BLT;
> -	engine->guc_id = GUC_BLITTER_ENGINE;
> -	engine->mmio_base = BLT_RING_BASE;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>
> -	logical_ring_default_irqs(engine, GEN8_BCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
> -	logical_ring_default_vfuncs(dev, engine);
> +	engine = logical_ring_setup(dev, BCS, "blitter ring",
> +				    I915_EXEC_BLT,
> +				    GUC_BLITTER_ENGINE,
> +				    BLT_RING_BASE,
> +				    GEN8_BCS_IRQ_SHIFT);
>
> -	return logical_ring_init(dev, engine);
> +	return logical_ring_init(engine);
>   }
>
>   static int logical_vebox_ring_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = &dev_priv->engine[VECS];
> -
> -	engine->name = "video enhancement ring";
> -	engine->id = VECS;
> -	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_VEBOX;
> -	engine->guc_id = GUC_VIDEOENHANCE_ENGINE;
> -	engine->mmio_base = VEBOX_RING_BASE;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>
> -	logical_ring_default_irqs(engine, GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT);
> -	logical_ring_default_vfuncs(dev, engine);
> +	engine = logical_ring_setup(dev, VECS, "video enhancement ring",
> +				    I915_EXEC_VEBOX,
> +				    GUC_VIDEOENHANCE_ENGINE,
> +				    VEBOX_RING_BASE,
> +				    GEN8_VECS_IRQ_SHIFT);
>
> -	return logical_ring_init(dev, engine);
> +	return logical_ring_init(engine);
>   }
>
>   /**
>

I still not see a point, maybe it just need to be explained to me. :) 
But anyway will not block it after the above points are addressed and 
discussed.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-28 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-28 13:47 [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor common engine setup Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 14:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for " Patchwork
2016-04-28 15:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-04-28 15:26   ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 16:12 ` Dave Gordon
2016-04-28 17:04   ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 17:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  9:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-29  9:15     ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  9:25       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-29  9:39         ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  9:50           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-29 10:00             ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-29 10:11               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-29 10:22                 ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-02  8:51                   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-02 10:58                     ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-09  7:02                       ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-09  7:45                         ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-09  7:58                           ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-09 10:41                             ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-10  7:46                               ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-10  7:50                                 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  9:42         ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=572227FE.7090806@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.