From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/shadow: account for ioreq server pages before complaining about not found mapping
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:28:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5723536C.7040702@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572333CF02000078000E719C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 29/04/16 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> prepare_ring_for_helper(), just like share_xen_page_with_guest(),
> takes a write reference on the page, and hence should similarly be
> accounted for when determining whether to log a complaint.
>
> This requires using recursive locking for the ioreq server lock, as the
> offending invocation of sh_remove_all_mappings() is down the call stack
> from hvm_set_ioreq_server_state(). (While not strictly needed to be
> done in all other instances too, convert all of them for consistency.)
>
> At once improve the usefulness of the shadow error message: Log all
> values involved in triggering it as well as the GFN (to aid
> understanding which guest page it is that there is a problem with - in
> cases like the one here the GFN is invariant across invocations, while
> the MFN obviously can [and will] vary).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
IMO, this is a 4.7 candidate. I already had a TODO list item of working
out why the shadow code was always complaining.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, albeit with one
further suggestion.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/flushtlb.h>
> #include <asm/shadow.h>
> +#include <asm/hvm/ioreq.h>
> #include <xen/numa.h>
> #include "private.h"
>
> @@ -2591,7 +2592,8 @@ int sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p(str
> /* Remove all mappings of a guest frame from the shadow tables.
> * Returns non-zero if we need to flush TLBs. */
>
> -static int sh_remove_all_mappings(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn)
> +static int sh_remove_all_mappings(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn,
> + unsigned long gfn)
It would be nice if we could use gfn_t rather than having more unsigned
longs.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 8:13 [PATCH] x86/shadow: account for ioreq server pages before complaining about not found mapping Jan Beulich
2016-04-29 8:29 ` Paul Durrant
2016-04-29 9:21 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-29 9:35 ` Paul Durrant
2016-04-29 12:28 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-04-29 12:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-29 13:12 ` Wei Liu
[not found] <20160429171022.GB97240@deinos.phlegethon.org>
2016-04-29 17:21 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5723536C.7040702@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.