From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1awBAn-0001jo-6C for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:21:45 +0000 Message-ID: <572389ED.6080306@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:21:01 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: ath10k IBSS and A-MSDU throuput References: <5723831A.7010607@tu-bs.de> In-Reply-To: <5723831A.7010607@tu-bs.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: "Harms, Hannes" , ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 04/29/2016 08:51 AM, Harms, Hannes wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have set up two Compex WLE900 in ad-hoc mode, 80MHz channel width, channel 100. > I am using kernel 3.17 from Gateworks for imx6 and > my own compat_wirless (4.4.2) with all patches from Candela for ath10k and all patches for mac80211 from the > Candela 4.4 kernel tree. > > The upload for TCP is about 200 MBit/s and the download is about 250 MBit/s, tested with iperf3. > > Now I am trying to enable A-MSDU as described in the firmware release 10.1.467-ct-15 from Candela, > but I can not measure anydifference in throughput. > > Could anyone confirm that A-MSDU is really working with IBSS? You can sniff it and see if you can sniff amsdu frames on air? I only tested it a bit when developing that feature for another user (who eventually decided to not use it anyway since it required linux kernel hacks to make it work), so possibly there was a regression... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k