From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/7] tcp: do not block bh during prequeue processing
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:47:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5723D676.30601@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461964613-4872-3-git-send-email-edumazet@google.com>
On 4/29/16 2:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> AFAIK, nothing in current TCP stack absolutely wants BH
> being disabled once socket is owned by a thread running in
> process context.
>
> As mentioned in my prior patch ("tcp: give prequeue mode some care"),
> processing a batch of packets might take time, better not block BH
> at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<edumazet@google.com>
> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh<soheil@google.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 21:16 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] net: make TCP preemptible Eric Dumazet
2016-04-29 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/7] tcp: do not assume TCP code is non preemptible Eric Dumazet
2016-04-29 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/7] tcp: do not block bh during prequeue processing Eric Dumazet
2016-04-29 21:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2016-04-29 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 3/7] dccp: do not assume DCCP code is non preemptible Eric Dumazet
2016-04-29 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 4/7] udp: prepare for non BH masking at backlog processing Eric Dumazet
2016-04-29 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 5/7] sctp: prepare for socket backlog behavior change Eric Dumazet
2016-04-29 22:01 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-04-29 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 6/7] net: do not block BH while processing socket backlog Eric Dumazet
2016-04-29 21:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-29 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 7/7] tcp: make tcp_sendmsg() aware of " Eric Dumazet
2016-05-03 4:49 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: guarantee forward progress in tcp_sendmsg() Eric Dumazet
2016-05-03 4:53 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2016-05-03 20:20 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5723D676.30601@fb.com \
--to=ast@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.