From: "Yong, Jonathan" <jonathan.yong@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4] PCI: PTM Driver
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:02:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57286935.3090409@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160429141750.GB949@localhost>
On 04/29/2016 22:17, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:29:17AM +0000, Yong, Jonathan wrote:
>> Hello LKML,
>>
>> This is a preliminary implementation of the PTM[1] support driver. This driver
>> has only been tested against a virtual PCI bus since there are no known
>> endpoints utilizing it yet.
>
> What sort of testing is this, exactly? Is this using a software model
> of devices that support PTM?
>
We wrote another driver to fake the PCI config space with pci_scan_bus,
with fake switches and fake devices. Convenient since the driver only
deals with the config space.
> When will hardware that supports PTM be available to you for testing?
> When will it be available on the market?
>
I don't have any dates for when consumer endpoints will hit the market.
PTM aware FPGA device models might come around Q3/Q4 this year, with
exercisers around 2017.
> I'm trying to figure out whether there's any benefit to merging
> something before it is useful to anybody.
>
True it won't be useful to anybody until such a device is available.
What is the general policy for future hardware standards?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-03 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 6:29 [RFC v4] PCI: PTM Driver Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-19 6:29 ` [PATCH] PCI: PTM preliminary implementation Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-29 16:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-30 12:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-10 3:52 ` Yong, Jonathan
2016-05-08 2:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-09 3:11 ` Yong, Jonathan
2016-05-09 13:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-27 23:18 ` [RFC v4] PCI: PTM Driver Yong, Jonathan
2016-04-29 14:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-03 9:02 ` Yong, Jonathan [this message]
2016-05-03 14:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-19 6:24 Yong, Jonathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57286935.3090409@intel.com \
--to=jonathan.yong@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.