From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 55/57] multipathd: asynchronous configuration Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:47:48 +0200 Message-ID: <57299B14.1030309@suse.de> References: <1461755458-29225-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1461755458-29225-56-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20160503182534.GH26117@octiron.msp.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160503182534.GH26117@octiron.msp.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Benjamin Marzinski Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer , Christophe Varoqui List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 05/03/2016 08:25 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:10:56PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > = > Oh, I did have one other thought. > = > If you're not changing the signal mask in uevent_listen, can't you just > use poll? Otherwise people are going to try and figure out what's going > on with the signals that they're missing (at least that's what I did). > = Sure. Don't have any issue with that. Cheers, Hannes -- = Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: F. Imend=F6rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg)