From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:04:45 -0500 Message-ID: <572A39BD.8020405@redhat.com> References: <1460747777-8479-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> <572A36BF.3070208@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Moyer Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 05/04/2016 12:58 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Mike Christie writes: > >> On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>> Hi, Mike, >>> >>> That git tree doesn't seem to exist. I did manage to apply your patch >>> set on top of next-20160415, though. >>> >>> So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems >> >> I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I >> did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression. >> >> What FS were you using? > > I'm using xfs, scsi disk, no blk-mq, no dm. > >>> - git clone fails >>> - yum segfaults >> >> In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two >> above. I have this fixed in the next version. > > OK, does this mean you're posting another version, or you already did > and I somehow missed it? > I did not repost yet. I am still testing. Jens had me add some wrappers around the operation access, so because of my last screw up and the wrapper change affected all my patches I am redoing all my testing. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C79F7CA0 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 13:04:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF84304064 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 11:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ytEctfr3wC2FDJd2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 04 May 2016 11:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs References: <1460747777-8479-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> <572A36BF.3070208@redhat.com> From: Mike Christie Message-ID: <572A39BD.8020405@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:04:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Moyer Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com On 05/04/2016 12:58 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Mike Christie writes: > >> On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>> Hi, Mike, >>> >>> That git tree doesn't seem to exist. I did manage to apply your patch >>> set on top of next-20160415, though. >>> >>> So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems >> >> I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I >> did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression. >> >> What FS were you using? > > I'm using xfs, scsi disk, no blk-mq, no dm. > >>> - git clone fails >>> - yum segfaults >> >> In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two >> above. I have this fixed in the next version. > > OK, does this mean you're posting another version, or you already did > and I somehow missed it? > I did not repost yet. I am still testing. Jens had me add some wrappers around the operation access, so because of my last screw up and the wrapper change affected all my patches I am redoing all my testing. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs In-Reply-To: References: <1460747777-8479-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> <572A36BF.3070208@redhat.com> Message-ID: <572A39BD.8020405@redhat.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jeff Moyer Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com On 05/04/2016 12:58 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Mike Christie writes: > >> On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>> Hi, Mike, >>> >>> That git tree doesn't seem to exist. I did manage to apply your patch >>> set on top of next-20160415, though. >>> >>> So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems >> >> I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I >> did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression. >> >> What FS were you using? > > I'm using xfs, scsi disk, no blk-mq, no dm. > >>> - git clone fails >>> - yum segfaults >> >> In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two >> above. I have this fixed in the next version. > > OK, does this mean you're posting another version, or you already did > and I somehow missed it? > I did not repost yet. I am still testing. Jens had me add some wrappers around the operation access, so because of my last screw up and the wrapper change affected all my patches I am redoing all my testing. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com (zimbra.linbit.com [212.69.161.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 732A01056458 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra13.linbit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689773EFD03 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra13.linbit.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 4qEYXWMngPXe for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra13.linbit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9793EFD4A for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra13.linbit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra13.linbit.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2q7GkY5Q5I3O for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:41:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soda.linbit (tuerlsteher.linbit.com [86.59.100.100]) by zimbra13.linbit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0745B3EFD03 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:41:24 +0200 (CEST) Resent-Message-ID: <20160506084124.GV16459@soda.linbit> Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail09.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTPS id 3B6E4105644E for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 20:04:50 +0200 (CEST) To: Jeff Moyer References: <1460747777-8479-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> <572A36BF.3070208@redhat.com> From: Mike Christie Message-ID: <572A39BD.8020405@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:04:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, philipp.reisner@linbit.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 05/04/2016 12:58 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Mike Christie writes: > >> On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >>> Hi, Mike, >>> >>> That git tree doesn't seem to exist. I did manage to apply your patch >>> set on top of next-20160415, though. >>> >>> So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems >> >> I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I >> did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression. >> >> What FS were you using? > > I'm using xfs, scsi disk, no blk-mq, no dm. > >>> - git clone fails >>> - yum segfaults >> >> In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two >> above. I have this fixed in the next version. > > OK, does this mean you're posting another version, or you already did > and I somehow missed it? > I did not repost yet. I am still testing. Jens had me add some wrappers around the operation access, so because of my last screw up and the wrapper change affected all my patches I am redoing all my testing.