From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayFhj-0005xJ-O6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 05:36:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayFhY-0002NZ-6v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 05:36:14 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:52742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayFhX-0002KZ-Td for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2016 05:36:08 -0400 References: <1462418761-12714-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <1462418761-12714-23-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <572B13EF.406@web.de> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:35:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1462418761-12714-23-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 22/26] x86-iommu: replace existing VT-d hooks into X86 ones List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Xu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, ehabkost@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com, davidkiarie4@gmail.com On 2016-05-05 05:25, Peter Xu wrote: > Previously, there are lots of VT-d hooks in common codes (like q35, > ioapic, etc.). A better way is to avoid using VT-d interfaces. Also, we > can start to abstract some common functions between Intel and future AMD > IOMMU device. Just don't introduce the VT-d variants in the first place. Will also shorten your patch series again. Jan