From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range References: <5728A7C3.4010001@roeck-us.net> <20160503143856.GE13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <5728BEC4.6050603@codeaurora.org> <20160503155141.GF13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <20160503171602.GA2518@roeck-us.net> <20160504141449.GG13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <572A0577.1070000@codeaurora.org> <20160504155932.GH13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <572A2099.4070901@codeaurora.org> <20160505164300.GA16914@roeck-us.net> <20160505182031.GB12434@dhcppc6.redhat.com> From: Timur Tabi Message-ID: <572B8F52.2000709@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:22:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160505182031.GB12434@dhcppc6.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Pratyush Anand , Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, open list , wim@iguana.be, fu.wei@linaro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, Dave Young , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Pratyush Anand wrote: > I think, in the long run we must have SBSA > watchdog specification improvement to keep WOR as 64 bit. I agree with this 100%. IMHO, using a 32-bit WOR was just a bad decision. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:44121 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752284AbcEESWN (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2016 14:22:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range To: Pratyush Anand , Guenter Roeck Cc: fu.wei@linaro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, wim@iguana.be, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, open list , Dave Young , kexec@lists.infradead.org References: <5728A7C3.4010001@roeck-us.net> <20160503143856.GE13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <5728BEC4.6050603@codeaurora.org> <20160503155141.GF13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <20160503171602.GA2518@roeck-us.net> <20160504141449.GG13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <572A0577.1070000@codeaurora.org> <20160504155932.GH13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <572A2099.4070901@codeaurora.org> <20160505164300.GA16914@roeck-us.net> <20160505182031.GB12434@dhcppc6.redhat.com> From: Timur Tabi Message-ID: <572B8F52.2000709@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:22:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160505182031.GB12434@dhcppc6.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Pratyush Anand wrote: > I think, in the long run we must have SBSA > watchdog specification improvement to keep WOR as 64 bit. I agree with this 100%. IMHO, using a 32-bit WOR was just a bad decision. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:22:10 -0500 Subject: [PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range In-Reply-To: <20160505182031.GB12434@dhcppc6.redhat.com> References: <5728A7C3.4010001@roeck-us.net> <20160503143856.GE13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <5728BEC4.6050603@codeaurora.org> <20160503155141.GF13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <20160503171602.GA2518@roeck-us.net> <20160504141449.GG13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <572A0577.1070000@codeaurora.org> <20160504155932.GH13045@dhcppc6.redhat.com> <572A2099.4070901@codeaurora.org> <20160505164300.GA16914@roeck-us.net> <20160505182031.GB12434@dhcppc6.redhat.com> Message-ID: <572B8F52.2000709@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Pratyush Anand wrote: > I think, in the long run we must have SBSA > watchdog specification improvement to keep WOR as 64 bit. I agree with this 100%. IMHO, using a 32-bit WOR was just a bad decision. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.