From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.5 3/6] scsi_debug: add multiple queue support
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 21:20:59 -0700
Message-ID: <572C1BAB.7030707@sandisk.com>
References: <1462070687-12689-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@interlog.com>
 <1462070687-12689-4-git-send-email-dgilbert@interlog.com>
 <572A7888.6000804@sandisk.com> <572C13EE.2040800@interlog.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bn1on0061.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.61]:58005
	"EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750727AbcEFEVH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 6 May 2016 00:21:07 -0400
In-Reply-To: <572C13EE.2040800@interlog.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: dgilbert@interlog.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, tomas.winkler@intel.com, emilne@redhat.com

On 05/05/16 20:47, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 2016-05-04 06:32 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 04/30/2016 07:44 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>>> +static struct sdebug_queue *get_queue(void)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct sdebug_queue *sqp = sdebug_q_arr;
>>> +
>>> +    return sqp + (raw_smp_processor_id() % submit_queues);
>>> +}
>>
>> Does this function have the same purpose as blk_mq_map_queue()? If so,
>> why has
>> this function been introduced instead of using blk_mq_map_queue()?
>
> No, it is copied from drivers/block/null_blk.c, the nullb_to_queue()
> function. scsi_lib.c seems to be the only user of blk_mq_map_queue().
>
>>> @@ -5001,6 +5158,10 @@ static int scsi_debug_queuecommand(struct
>>> Scsi_Host
>>> *shost,
>>>       bool has_wlun_rl;
>>>
>>>       scsi_set_resid(scp, 0);
>>> +    if (sdebug_statistics) {
>>> +        sqp = get_queue();
>>> +        atomic_inc(&sqp->cmnd_count);
>>> +    }
>>
>> Why does scsi_debug_queuecommand() call get_queue() instead of
>> blk_mq_unique_tag() and blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq() which is what other
>> scsi-mq
>> drivers do?
>
> Okay I have switched to using:
>      u32 tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(cmnd->request);
>      u16 hwq = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(tag);
>      return sqp + hwq;
>
> and as far as I can tell it works just as well as:
>      return sqp + (raw_smp_processor_id() % submit_queues);

Thanks for the feedback. I was not yet aware that null_blk also follows 
this approach. Apparently null_blk has its own prep function and that 
prep function needs access to the submit queue. Maybe that is why 
null_blk has its own submit queue selection function. However, I'd like 
to see that kind of code being moved from the null_blk driver into the 
blk-mq core.

>> Is the role of the sqp->cmnd_count counter identical to that of
>> blk_mq_hw_ctx.queued? If so, can sqp->cmnd_count be left out and can
>> blk_mq_hw_ctx.queued be used instead?
>
> Not quite, it counts commands in, some of which may get
> responded to in the same thread (e.g. when a SCSI illegal request
> type error is being reported). But it is very close to my
> "completions" count.
>
> So I'll move those counters back into file scope which simplifies
> scsi_debug's logic. The cmnd_counter is used in the injection of
> pseudo errors "every_nth" command. Can blk_mq_hw_ctx.queued be
> viewed from the user space?

As far as I can see, yes. From block/blk-mq-sysfs.c:

static ssize_t blk_mq_hw_sysfs_queued_show(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
					   char *page)
{
	return sprintf(page, "%lu\n", hctx->queued);
}

>>> @@ -5168,6 +5328,16 @@ static int sdebug_driver_probe(struct device *
>>> dev)
>>> +    if (sdebug_mq_available && (submit_queues > 1))
>>> +        hpnt->nr_hw_queues = submit_queues;
>>
>> There is already a submit_queues < 1 check in scsi_debug_init(). Is the
>> submit_queues > 1 check in sdebug_driver_probe() needed?
>
> I noticed that the other (2) scsi mq LLDs take care only to set
> hpnt->nr_hw_queues when the submit_queues > 1 .

You might have overlooked the ib_srp driver. That driver is a SCSI LLD 
to which support for multiple hardware queues was added before it was 
added to the lpfc and virtio_scsi drivers.

I haven't found any code in any of these three drivers that only 
modifies nr_hw_queues if submit_queues > 1 ? Anyway, this is a detail 
and something I do not consider important.

Bart.