From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/14] libata: ZAC support Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:05:36 +0200 Message-ID: <572C7A80.4000903@suse.de> References: <1461581156-92581-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20160425201627.GI7822@mtj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51714 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751695AbcEFLFk (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2016 07:05:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160425201627.GI7822@mtj.duckdns.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Shaun Tancheff , Damien Le Moal , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 04/25/2016 10:16 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:45:42PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> here's a patchset implementing ZAC support for libata. >> >> This is the second part of a larger patchset for ZAC/ZBC support; >> it requires the scsi trace fixes queued for in mkp/4.7/scsi-queue an= d >> the patchset 'libata: SATL update' queued in tj/for-4.7-zac. >=20 > The patches look good from libata side. If others are okay with it, = I > can pull mkp/4.7/scsi-queue into tj/for-4.7-zac and apply this series > on top of it. >=20 Ping? I can easily split off the libsas bits into a different patchset if this turns out to be an issue. But it would be really good if this could make it 4.7, it will help further integration a _lot_. Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: F. Imend=F6rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg)