All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com>
To: Joshua G Lock <joshua.g.lock@linux.intel.com>,
	akuster <akuster@mvista.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [master][krogoth][PATCH 1/2] qemu: Security fix CVE-2016-2857
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 08:47:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <572CBC7E.9080407@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462400231.6485.19.camel@linux.intel.com>



On 05/04/2016 03:17 PM, Joshua G Lock wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 07:16 -0700, akuster wrote:
>>
>> On 05/04/2016 02:52 AM, Joshua G Lock wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Armin,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 11:23 -0700, Armin Kuster wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Armin Kuster <akuster@mvista.com>
>>>>
>>> I've been seeing:
>>>
>>> "qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core
>>> dumped"
>>>
>>> when trying to build gobject-introspection for qemux86 recently and
>>> narrowed it down to this change, if I revert this patch the use of
>>> qemu-native by gobject-introspection no longer causes a
>>> segmentation
>>> fault.
>> well that is not good. To be clear, this is a build issue not an
>> execution issue? I would like to better understand what went wrong to
>> tighten up my processes.
> 
> It's an execution issue for qemu-native, the segmentation error occurs
> when trying to build gobject-introspection (which calls qemu-native).
> 
> I didn't try calling qemu-native any other way (runqemu, etc) to see
> whether it was something specific to the way gobject-introspection
> calls qemu.
> 

I can not reproduce this issue. I have used two different build systems.
I have another I will try.

so the testcase be?

1) bitbake core-image-sato
2) runqemu qemux86

I am surprised the AB didn't catch this prior to release.


>>>
>>>
>>> Are we missing some related patches for this CVE fix? 
>> The only commit identified for is the on this patch came from.
>>
>> I haven't dug
>>>
>>> into the details, but noticed that Fedora's CVE-2016-2857
>>> diffstat[1]
>>> is much larger than ours[2].
>> The Fedora change includes several other CVE fixes
>> +# CVE-2016-2538: Integer overflow in usb module (bz #1305815)
>> +Patch0103: 0103-usb-check-RNDIS-message-length.patch
>> +Patch0104: 0104-usb-check-RNDIS-buffer-offsets-length.patch
>> +# CVE-2016-2841: ne2000: infinite loop (bz #1304047)
>> +Patch0105: 0105-net-ne2000-check-ring-buffer-control-registers.patch
>> +# CVE-2016-2857: net: out of bounds read (bz #1309564)
>> +Patch0106: 0106-net-check-packet-payload-length.patch
>> +# CVE-2016-2392: usb: null pointer dereference (bz #1307115)
>> +Patch0107: 0107-usb-check-USB-configuration-descriptor-object.patch
>> +# Fix external snapshot any more after active committing (bz
>> #1300209)
>> +Patch0108: 0108-block-set-device_list.tqe_prev-to-NULL-on-BDS-
>> remova.patch
>>
>> which we seem to be missing some as well.
> 
> Several (possibly all) of those are in the 2.5.1 upgrade I proposed. 

There are over 50 commits in that release, some of them extend
functionality which is why I am a bit hesitant in upgrading Krogoth at
this time. Dot releases tend to be the cleaner method to loads for back
ports. I need to think about this a bit more.


Is anyone else seeing a problem?

- Armin
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Joshua
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-06 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-28 18:23 [master][krogoth][PATCH 1/2] qemu: Security fix CVE-2016-2857 Armin Kuster
2016-04-28 18:23 ` [master][krogoth][PATCH 2/2] qemu: Security fix CVE-2016-2858 Armin Kuster
2016-05-04  9:52 ` [master][krogoth][PATCH 1/2] qemu: Security fix CVE-2016-2857 Joshua G Lock
2016-05-04  9:58   ` Alexander Kanavin
2016-05-04 10:49   ` Joshua G Lock
     [not found]   ` <572A0450.10100@mvista.com>
2016-05-04 22:17     ` Joshua G Lock
2016-05-06 15:47       ` akuster808 [this message]
2016-05-06 15:51         ` Alexander Kanavin
2016-05-09 21:27           ` akuster808
2016-05-10 13:46             ` Joshua G Lock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=572CBC7E.9080407@gmail.com \
    --to=akuster808@gmail.com \
    --cc=akuster@mvista.com \
    --cc=joshua.g.lock@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.