From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id EE095E00C94; Fri, 6 May 2016 18:51:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [62.149.158.120 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.5 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 1 to 5% * [score: 0.0283] X-Greylist: delayed 63 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Fri, 06 May 2016 18:51:53 PDT Received: from smtpweb120.aruba.it (smtpweb120.aruba.it [62.149.158.120]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42182E00C86 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 18:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([94.33.39.20]) by smtpcmd03.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id rDqo1s00E0S5K6601DqopK; Sat, 07 May 2016 03:50:49 +0200 To: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org From: Pierluigi Passaro Message-ID: <572D49F7.4060107@phoenixsoftware.it> Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 03:50:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Unhandled fault loading PRU related modules X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 01:51:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, using lastest TI SDK 02.00.02, I observed "Unhandled fault" messages while loading PRU modules. This is causing some problem lately in suspend resume process. After some investigations, I suppose the cause is the CPU type: I'm using AM3354 that doesn't have PRU. Is there any way to let the probe cleanly fail with something like -ENODEV testing at runtime if the CPU is AM3352 or AM3354? Thanks BR Pierluigi