From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4E80BE00C94; Fri, 6 May 2016 19:04:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [62.149.158.120 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtpweb120.aruba.it (smtpweb120.aruba.it [62.149.158.120]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD75AE00C86 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 19:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([94.33.39.20]) by smtpcmd03.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id rE4b1s00N0S5K6601E4blS; Sat, 07 May 2016 04:04:35 +0200 To: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org From: Pierluigi Passaro Message-ID: <572D4D32.7020006@phoenixsoftware.it> Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 04:04:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: AM335x Power Management Standby X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 02:04:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I'm testing suspend resume with latest TI SDK 02.00.02 on AM3354 but I'm observing some strange behaviours. 1) GPIO banks It looks that GPIOs from banks different from 0 are not able to resume the neither in mem, nor in stanby mode: is the expected behaviour? 2) TSC It looks that the first time you suspend the board is not able to cause the wakeup, but if you wakeup in any other ways, the following times the TSC correctly wakeup the board. 3) USB According link http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/AM335x_Power_Management_Standby_User's_Guide#USB_wakeup the USB should wakeup the board, but nothing happen. 4) UART According link http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/AM335x_Power_Management_Standby_User's_Guide#Wakeup_Sources the UARTs could be allowed to wakeup the boards, but the procedure does not apply (invalid sys path) Anyone tested wakeup sources with AM3354? Any suggestion or workaround? Thanks Regards Pierluigi