From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 0/6] net sched: Fix broken late binding of actions Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 07:54:56 -0400 Message-ID: <57307A90.40007@mojatatu.com> References: <1462728392-28489-1-git-send-email-jhs@emojatatu.com> <572F7761.2020103@mojatatu.com> <20160509.003048.2157155806457543450.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:35662 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751389AbcEILy6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 07:54:58 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id bi2so101696229igb.0 for ; Mon, 09 May 2016 04:54:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160509.003048.2157155806457543450.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16-05-09 12:30 AM, David Miller wrote: >> Dave, these deserve to go into -stable as well. > > Then don't target them at 'net-next'. If it's good enough for -stable > it's by definition good enough for 'net'. > will resend after processing comments. cheers, jamal