All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: core: Fix circular locking dependency
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 07:18:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57309C21.9070201@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160509135303.GA1474@archie.localdomain>

On 05/09/2016 06:53 AM, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 07:38:14AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> lockdep reports the following circular locking dependency.
>>
>> ======================================================
>> INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>> 4.6.0-rc3-00191-gfabf418 #162 Not tainted
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> systemd/1 is trying to acquire lock:
>> ((&(&wd_data->work)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<80141650>] flush_work+0x0/0x280
>>
>> but task is already holding lock:
>>
>> (&wd_data->lock){+.+...}, at: [<804acfa8>] watchdog_release+0x18/0x190
>>
>> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>>
>> -> #1 (&wd_data->lock){+.+...}:
>> 	[<80662310>] mutex_lock_nested+0x64/0x4a8
>> 	[<804aca4c>] watchdog_ping_work+0x18/0x4c
>> 	[<80143128>] process_one_work+0x1ac/0x500
>> 	[<801434b4>] worker_thread+0x38/0x554
>> 	[<80149510>] kthread+0xf4/0x108
>> 	[<80107c10>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
>>
>> -> #0 ((&(&wd_data->work)->work)){+.+...}:
>> 	[<8017c4e8>] lock_acquire+0x70/0x90
>> 	[<8014169c>] flush_work+0x4c/0x280
>> 	[<801440f8>] __cancel_work_timer+0x9c/0x1e0
>> 	[<804acfcc>] watchdog_release+0x3c/0x190
>> 	[<8022c5e8>] __fput+0x80/0x1c8
>> 	[<80147b28>] task_work_run+0x94/0xc8
>> 	[<8010b998>] do_work_pending+0x8c/0xb4
>> 	[<80107ba8>] slow_work_pending+0xc/0x20
>>
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>
>> CPU0                    CPU1
>> ----                    ----
>> lock(&wd_data->lock);
>>                          lock((&(&wd_data->work)->work));
>>                          lock(&wd_data->lock);
>> lock((&(&wd_data->work)->work));
>>
>> *** DEADLOCK ***
>>
>> 1 lock held by systemd/1:
>>
>> stack backtrace:
>> CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 4.6.0-rc3-00191-gfabf418 #162
>> Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
>> [<8010f5e4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010c038>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [<8010c038>] (show_stack) from [<8039d7fc>] (dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4)
>> [<8039d7fc>] (dump_stack) from [<80177ee0>] (print_circular_bug+0x214/0x334)
>> [<80177ee0>] (print_circular_bug) from [<80179230>] (check_prevs_add+0x4dc/0x8e8)
>> [<80179230>] (check_prevs_add) from [<8017b3d8>] (__lock_acquire+0xc6c/0x14ec)
>> [<8017b3d8>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017c4e8>] (lock_acquire+0x70/0x90)
>> [<8017c4e8>] (lock_acquire) from [<8014169c>] (flush_work+0x4c/0x280)
>> [<8014169c>] (flush_work) from [<801440f8>] (__cancel_work_timer+0x9c/0x1e0)
>> [<801440f8>] (__cancel_work_timer) from [<804acfcc>] (watchdog_release+0x3c/0x190)
>> [<804acfcc>] (watchdog_release) from [<8022c5e8>] (__fput+0x80/0x1c8)
>> [<8022c5e8>] (__fput) from [<80147b28>] (task_work_run+0x94/0xc8)
>> [<80147b28>] (task_work_run) from [<8010b998>] (do_work_pending+0x8c/0xb4)
>> [<8010b998>] (do_work_pending) from [<80107ba8>] (slow_work_pending+0xc/0x20)
>>
>> Turns out the call to cancel_delayed_work_sync() in watchdog_release()
>> is not necessary and can be dropped. If the worker is no longer necessary,
>> the subsequent call to watchdog_update_worker() will cancel it. If it is
>> already running, it won't do anything, since the worker function checks
>> if it needs to ping the watchdog or not.
>>
>> Reported-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
>> Tested-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
>> Fixes: 11d7aba9ceb7 ("watchdog: imx2: Convert to use infrastructure triggered keepalives")
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> ---
>>   drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 1 -
>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
>> index e2c5abbb45ff..3595cffa24ea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
>> @@ -736,7 +736,6 @@ static int watchdog_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>>   		watchdog_ping(wdd);
>>   	}
>>
>> -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wd_data->work);
>>   	watchdog_update_worker(wdd);
>>
>>   	/* make sure that /dev/watchdog can be re-opened */
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't see this patch in the torvalds/linux tree.
>
> Will this get in before the 4.6 release?
>
Hopefully. If not, I assume Wim will pick it up in the next commit window and
it will be applied to -stable.

Guenter



  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-09 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 14:38 [PATCH] watchdog: core: Fix circular locking dependency Guenter Roeck
2016-04-21 14:50 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-04-21 23:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-09 13:53 ` Clemens Gruber
2016-05-09 14:18   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-05-14 16:41 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2016-05-14 17:07   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-14 17:24     ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-14 18:29       ` Wim Van Sebroeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57309C21.9070201@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.