From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azmXc-0007oU-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 10:52:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azmXX-0005wQ-Lo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 10:52:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azmXX-0005vr-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 10:52:07 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5058F50B for ; Mon, 9 May 2016 14:52:06 +0000 (UTC) References: <1461903820-3092-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> <57304F6F.7070406@redhat.com> <57305891.9060900@redhat.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <5730A414.7040401@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 08:52:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57305891.9060900@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xxwXuEWlUvXkbpFmi7xASFTROjhvd0fqs" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/18] Add qapi-to-JSON and clone visitors List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: famz@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xxwXuEWlUvXkbpFmi7xASFTROjhvd0fqs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/09/2016 03:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 09/05/2016 10:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 29/04/2016 06:23, Eric Blake wrote: >>> Note that the series has a mutually exclusive choice: either >>> patch 8, or patches 10-11. I still haven't gotten any feedback >>> on which choice seems nicer. >> >> I vote for patch 8. >=20 > Nice first email after 3 weeks, I meant exactly the opposite. :) Havin= g > two APIs for the same thing is unnecessary. >=20 > However, including all of patches 8/10/11 may also make sense (and > leaving out the revert). Then qjson is migrated first, then its users > move away from qjson, then qjson is removed. You'll want to catch up on the rest of the thread - for now, v4 of this series will drop 8-11 entirely, because Dave was unwilling to accept any new assertions on the migration path, so we instead moved qjson.c under migration/ and added explicit comments why it is duplicating a rudimentary JSON output engine but with no error checking or assertions. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --xxwXuEWlUvXkbpFmi7xASFTROjhvd0fqs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXMKQUAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqtfAH/2YUj4FtPKVMDg8zo7XM+vmQ IEYIYZJFoJ3mB+ysesQGGCXOb0D8JhR/5kmj+B+/1+KldmQEzVH8y0rofu47OVnf GG2Awz2P0kb26zR8Kipnl0OfEDA5bM/Kjeb7USqThdr+2xxpkkwNdYYz7gwY9tim d094w7I2Zt1a109OOPMKucOwQ2qblr9X6cs15fJjI5vF8s+XIEW+tyNvUGllkZp+ UFuQDyq7SnUlHsnPJSkSwOqzbgarO4k2A22GPz5r+InXLaHFKtJVE1ZMQzRf1ypB 7yjRZ7uTWnigEiny8UbsgXiGUHrMSvHR5euNacUXOB6VAApjSZ0uPD3j76Z+EPA= =cV1l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xxwXuEWlUvXkbpFmi7xASFTROjhvd0fqs--