All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] XSA-77: widen scope again
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:19:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5730B89A.2050904@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572C6DF202000078000E8F07@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 06/05/16 09:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 29.04.16 at 11:35, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> As discussed on the hackathon, avoid us having to issue security
>> advisories for issues affecting only heavily disaggregated tool stack
>> setups, which no-one appears to use (or else they should step up to get
>> things into shape).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> Ping?
> 
>> ---
>> As we want to retain supported status of stubdom qemu: Does qemu use
>> any others when use in a stub domain?
>>
>> --- a/docs/misc/xsm-flask.txt
>> +++ b/docs/misc/xsm-flask.txt
>> @@ -59,68 +59,16 @@ http://www.xenproject.org/security-polic 
>>  
>>  __HYPERVISOR_domctl (xen/include/public/domctl.h)
>>  
>> - The following subops are covered by this statement. subops not listed
>> - here are considered safe for disaggregation.
>> + All subops except for the following are covered by this statement.

Sorry I'm just getting to this -- I think the wording is a bit unclear here.

The previous wording made it clear what "covered by this statement"
means -- i.e., "subops not listed here are considered safe for
disaggregation".

Maybe something like this:

"All subops except the following are covered by this statement.  (That
is, only the subops below are considered safe for disaggregation.)"

>>  
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_createdomain
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_destroydomain
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_getmemlist
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_max_mem
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_setvcpucontext
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_getvcpucontext
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_max_vcpus
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_scheduler_op
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_iomem_permission
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_gethvmcontext
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_sethvmcontext
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_set_address_size
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_assign_device
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_pin_mem_cacheattr
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_set_ext_vcpucontext
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_get_ext_vcpucontext
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_test_assign_device
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_set_target
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_deassign_device
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_get_device_group
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_set_machine_address_size
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_debug_op
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_gethvmcontext_partial
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_vm_event_op
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_mem_sharing_op
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_setvcpuextstate
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_getvcpuextstate
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_set_access_required
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_set_virq_handler
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_set_broken_page_p2m
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_setnodeaffinity
>> - * XEN_DOMCTL_gdbsx_guestmemio
>> + * XEN_DOMCTL_ioport_mapping
>> + * XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping
>> + * XEN_DOMCTL_bind_pt_irq
>> + * XEN_DOMCTL_unbind_pt_irq
>>  
>>  __HYPERVISOR_sysctl (xen/include/public/sysctl.h)
>>  
>> - The following subops are covered by this statement. subops not listed
>> - here are considered safe for disaggregation.
>> -
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_readconsole
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_tbuf_op
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_sched_id
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_perfc_op
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_getdomaininfolist
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_debug_keys
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_getcpuinfo
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_availheap
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_get_pmstat
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_cpu_hotplug
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_pm_op
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_page_offline_op
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_lockprof_op
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_numainfo
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_cpupool_op
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_scheduler_op
>> - * XEN_SYSCTL_coverage_op
>> + All subops are covered by this statement.

"... (That is, no subops are considered safe for disaggregation.)"

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-09 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-29  9:35 [PATCH] XSA-77: widen scope again Jan Beulich
2016-05-06  8:12 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2016-05-09 16:19   ` George Dunlap [this message]
2016-05-10  6:41     ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-06 14:26 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-09  9:31   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-09 10:56     ` Wei Liu
2016-05-09 11:18       ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-09 11:20         ` Wei Liu
2016-05-09 14:16 ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5730B89A.2050904@citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.