From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: [Xenomai] Prio ceiling mutex issues
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 21:03:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5730DF08.8080309@siemens.com> (raw)
Hi Philippe,
we ran into at least one bug of the current prio ceiling support for
synch objects: on xnsynch_release, we only reschedule if we woken up a
new owner. But we also have to reschedule after dropping the ceiling
prio as some higher prio thread may be waiting.
For that, I would propose to alter the return type and semantic of
xnsynch_release from "pointer to new owner" into "bool, true if
reschedule is needed". It seems, no caller of xnsynch_release makes a
non-boolean use of the return value anyway. And then we can simply
return true on "synch->status & XNSYNCH_PP".
That leads to the question what would happen in the fast case. Consider
pthread_mutex_lock(ceiling_mutex);
wake_up_thread(some_thread); // caller_prio < target_prio < ceiling_prio
pthread_mutex_unlock(ceiling_mutex);
To my current understanding, there is nothing enforcing a syscall for
the unlock caller if some thread woke up after the lock, thus may have a
high prio after the unlock. Or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-09 19:03 Jan Kiszka [this message]
2016-05-09 19:16 ` [Xenomai] Prio ceiling mutex issues Jan Kiszka
2016-05-09 19:22 ` Philippe Gerum
2016-05-09 19:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-05-09 19:30 ` Philippe Gerum
2016-05-09 19:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-05-10 13:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-05-10 13:57 ` Philippe Gerum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5730DF08.8080309@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.