All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: mikey@neuling.org, frederic.barrat@fr.ibm.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, imunsie@au1.ibm.com,
	andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc/pci: Assign fixed PHB number based on device-tree properties
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 14:32:58 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57321B4A.1000201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160502165739.GD24851@localhost>

On 05/02/2016 01:57 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:55:24PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
>> The domain/PHB field of PCI addresses has its value obtained from a
>> global variable, incremented each time a new domain (represented by
>> struct pci_controller) is added on the system. The domain addition
>> process happens during boot or due to PCI device hotplug.
>>
>> As recent kernels are using predictable naming for network interfaces,
>> the network stack is more tied to PCI naming. This can be a problem in
>> hotplug scenarios, because PCI addresses will change if devices are
>> removed and then re-added. This situation seems unusual, but it can
>> happen if a user wants to replace a NIC without rebooting the machine,
>> for example.
>>
>> This patch changes the way PCI domain values are generated: now, we use
>> device-tree properties to assign fixed PHB numbers to PCI addresses
>> when available (meaning pSeries and PowerNV cases). We also use a bitmap
>> to allow dynamic PHB numbering when device-tree properties are not
>> used. This bitmap keeps track of used PHB numbers and if a PHB is
>> released (by hotplug operations for example), it allows the reuse of
>> this PHB number, avoiding PCI address to change in case of device remove
>> and re-add soon after. No functional changes were introduced.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> I assume the powerpc guys will take care of this.  Let me know if you
> need me to do anything.

Thanks very much Bjorn! I sent this to PCI list to let you know, since 
this modification is PCI nearly related. But it is truly something 
specific to powerpc, so you're right, the linuxpcc-dev list folks will 
take care.

Cheers,


Guilherme

>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> v5:
>>    * Improved comments.
>>
>>    * Changed the the Fixed PHB Numbering to set the PHB number bit
>>    on the bitmap anyway, avoiding issues when system has virtual PHBs.
>>
>>    * Changed the device-tree check order - now, firstly we check for
>>    "ibm,opal-phbid" and if it's not available, we try the pSeries case.
>>
>> v4:
>>    * Minor change (if/else nesting rearranged).
>>
>> v3:
>>    * Made the bitmap static.
>>
>>    * Rearranged if/else statements of Fixed PHB checking.
>>
>>    * Improved bitmap checkings, by removing loop and using instead the
>>    find_first_zero_bit() function.
>>
>>    * Removed the single-statement function release_phb_number() by
>>    adding its logic directly into pcibios_free_controller().
>>
>>    *Added check for bitmap size before clearing bit, avoiding memory
>>    corruption.
>>
>> v2:
>>    * Added the Fixed PHB Numbering mechanism based on device-tree
>>    properties.
>>
>>    * Changed list approach to bitmap on the Dynamic PHB Numbering
>>    mechanism.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 0f7a60f..ad423c1 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -41,11 +41,17 @@
>>   #include <asm/ppc-pci.h>
>>   #include <asm/eeh.h>
>>
>> +/* hose_spinlock protects accesses to the the phb_bitmap. */
>>   static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hose_spinlock);
>>   LIST_HEAD(hose_list);
>>
>> -/* XXX kill that some day ... */
>> -static int global_phb_number;		/* Global phb counter */
>> +/* For dynamic PHB numbering on get_phb_number(): max number of PHBs. */
>> +#define	MAX_PHBS	8192
>> +
>> +/* For dynamic PHB numbering: used/free PHBs tracking bitmap.
>> + * Accesses to this bitmap should be protected by hose_spinlock.
>> + */
>> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(phb_bitmap, MAX_PHBS);
>>
>>   /* ISA Memory physical address */
>>   resource_size_t isa_mem_base;
>> @@ -64,6 +70,55 @@ struct dma_map_ops *get_pci_dma_ops(void)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_pci_dma_ops);
>>
>> +/* get_phb_number() function should run under locking
>> + * protection, specifically hose_spinlock.
>> + */
>> +static int get_phb_number(struct device_node *dn)
>> +{
>> +	const __be64 *prop64;
>> +	const __be32 *regs;
>> +	int phb_id = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* Try fixed PHB numbering first, by checking archs and reading
>> +	 * the respective device-tree properties. Firstly, try PowerNV by
>> +	 * reading "ibm,opal-phbid", only present in OPAL environment.
>> +	 */
>> +	prop64 = of_get_property(dn, "ibm,opal-phbid", NULL);
>> +	if (prop64) {
>> +		phb_id = (int)(be64_to_cpup(prop64) & 0xFFFF);
>> +
>> +	} else if (machine_is(pseries)) {
>> +		regs = of_get_property(dn, "reg", NULL);
>> +		if (regs)
>> +			phb_id = (int)(be32_to_cpu(regs[1]) & 0xFFFF);
>> +	} else {
>> +		goto dynamic_phb_numbering;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* If we have a huge PHB number obtained from device-tree, no need
>> +	 * to worry with the bitmap. Otherwise, we need to be sure we're
>> +	 * not trying to use the same PHB number twice.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (phb_id < MAX_PHBS) {
>> +		if (test_bit(phb_id, phb_bitmap))
>> +			goto dynamic_phb_numbering;
>> +		set_bit(phb_id, phb_bitmap);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return phb_id;
>> +
>> +	/* If not pSeries nor PowerNV, or if fixed PHB numbering tried to add
>> +	 * the same PHB number twice, then fallback to dynamic PHB numbering.
>> +	 */
>> +dynamic_phb_numbering:
>> +
>> +	phb_id = find_first_zero_bit(phb_bitmap, MAX_PHBS);
>> +	BUG_ON(phb_id >= MAX_PHBS); /* Reached maximum number of PHBs. */
>> +	set_bit(phb_id, phb_bitmap);
>> +
>> +	return phb_id;
>> +}
>> +
>>   struct pci_controller *pcibios_alloc_controller(struct device_node *dev)
>>   {
>>   	struct pci_controller *phb;
>> @@ -72,7 +127,7 @@ struct pci_controller *pcibios_alloc_controller(struct device_node *dev)
>>   	if (phb == NULL)
>>   		return NULL;
>>   	spin_lock(&hose_spinlock);
>> -	phb->global_number = global_phb_number++;
>> +	phb->global_number = get_phb_number(dev);
>>   	list_add_tail(&phb->list_node, &hose_list);
>>   	spin_unlock(&hose_spinlock);
>>   	phb->dn = dev;
>> @@ -94,6 +149,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcibios_alloc_controller);
>>   void pcibios_free_controller(struct pci_controller *phb)
>>   {
>>   	spin_lock(&hose_spinlock);
>> +
>> +	/* Clear bit of phb_bitmap to allow reuse of this PHB number. */
>> +	if (phb->global_number < MAX_PHBS)
>> +		clear_bit(phb->global_number, phb_bitmap);
>> +
>>   	list_del(&phb->list_node);
>>   	spin_unlock(&hose_spinlock);
>>
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-10 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14 21:55 [PATCH v5] powerpc/pci: Assign fixed PHB number based on device-tree properties Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-04-19  7:27 ` Ian Munsie
2016-04-19 13:31   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-05-02 16:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-05-10 17:32   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57321B4A.1000201@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=frederic.barrat@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.