From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Zp6-0007Fd-T7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:29:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Zp1-0006fd-PZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:29:31 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.111]:57174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0Zp1-0006cD-Bl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:29:27 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 11 May 2016 20:29:22 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333932190046 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 20:28:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.248]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u4BJSwvf23921102 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 19:28:58 GMT Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u4BJSwGj005037 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 15:28:58 -0400 References: <1462812240-31204-1-git-send-email-aurelien@aurel32.net> <5730CE8B.1000203@weilnetz.de> From: Christian Borntraeger Message-ID: <573387F9.8080304@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 21:28:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-mips: fix call to memset in soft reset code List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Stefan Weil Cc: Leon Alrae , QEMU Developers , Aurelien Jarno On 05/09/2016 07:57 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 May 2016 at 18:55, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 9 May 2016 at 18:53, Stefan Weil wrote: >>> I suggest to apply this patch to 2.6, if this is still possible >> >> It is not; sorry. I think we have delayed 2.6 already far too long (so please release) but > Note that it's only an error if you're building with -Werror, and > releases don't default to -Werror, so users using released QEMU 2.6 > shouldn't hit this even with the newer gcc. Developers developing > on trunk shouldn't be unduly inconvenienced if the commit fixing it > is post-2.6-release rather than the actual release. to me it looks like that this is not a compile time error, instead we really do not memset a variable that we are supposed to memset. the only reason to not consider it for 2.6 is that its is really old and it did not seem to cause harm. Christian