From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0hsr-0006v9-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 00:05:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0hsp-0006Sa-PE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 00:05:56 -0400 Message-ID: <573401D6.4010108@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:08:54 +0800 From: Changlong Xie MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1460707838-13510-1-git-send-email-xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160506155102.GB23075@stefanha-x1.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20160506155102.GB23075@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v18 0/8] Block replication for continuous checkpoints List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jeff Cody Cc: qemu devel , Eric Blake , Alberto Garcia , Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu block , Wen Congyang , Jiang Yunhong , Dong Eddie , Markus Armbruster , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Stefan Hajnoczi On 05/06/2016 11:51 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:10:30PM +0800, Changlong Xie wrote: >> Block replication is a very important feature which is used for >> continuous checkpoints(for example: COLO). >> >> You can get the detailed information about block replication from here: >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/BlockReplication >> >> Usage: >> Please refer to docs/block-replication.txt >> >> This patch series is based on the following patch series: >> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-04/msg02093.html >> >> You can get the patch here: >> https://github.com/Pating/qemu/tree/changlox/block-replication-v18 >> >> You can get the patch with framework here: >> https://github.com/Pating/qemu/tree/changlox/colo_framework_v17 > > Overall I'm happy with the approach. I posted some specific comments on > the main patch. > > I've also pinged Jeff Cody, block jobs maintainer, to check that he's > comfortable with the "internal" block jobs that this patch series runs. Hi jeff Do you have any comments on "internal" block jobs(see patch 5/8)? Thanks -Xie >