All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: hide finish_arch_post_lock_switch from modules
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 06:51:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5735DBC9.10204@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463146234-161304-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

On 05/13/2016 06:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> The introduction of switch_mm_irqs_off() brought back an old bug
> regarding the use of preempt_enable_no_resched:
>
> As part of 62b94a08da1b ("sched/preempt: Take away
> preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules"), the definition of
> preempt_enable_no_resched() is only available in built-in code,
> not in loadable modules, so we can't generally use it from header
> files. However, the ARM version of finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
> calls preempt_enable_no_resched() and is defined as a static
> inline function in asm/mmu_context.h. This in turn means we cannot
> include asm/mmu_context.h from modules.
>
> With today's tip tree, asm/mmu_context.h gets included from
> linux/mmu_context.h, which is normally the exact pattern one would
> expect, but unfortunately, linux/mmu_context.h can be included from
> the vhost driver that is a loadable module, now causing this compile
> time error:
>
> In file included from ../include/linux/mmu_context.h:4:0,
>                   from ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:18:
> ../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'finish_arch_post_lock_switch':
> ../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h:88:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_enable_no_resched' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     preempt_enable_no_resched();
>
> Andy already tried to fix the bug by including linux/preempt.h
> from asm/mmu_context.h, but that didn't help. I suggested reordering
> the header files, which wasn't popular, but Steve came up with this
> workaround instead:
>
> The finish_arch_post_lock_switch() definition is now also hidden
> inside of #ifdef MODULE, so we don't see anything referencing
> preempt_enable_no_resched() from a header file. I've built a
> few hundred randconfig kernels with this, and did not see any
> new problems.
>
> Fixes: f98db6013c55 ("sched/core: Add switch_mm_irqs_off() and use it in the scheduler")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>   arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index ed73babc0dc9..3cc14dd8587c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   		cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
>   }
>
> +#ifndef MODULE
>   #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
>   	finish_arch_post_lock_switch
>   static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
> @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
>   		preempt_enable_no_resched();
>   	}
>   }
> +#endif /* !MODULE */
>
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_MMU */
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: hide finish_arch_post_lock_switch from modules
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 06:51:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5735DBC9.10204@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463146234-161304-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>

On 05/13/2016 06:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> The introduction of switch_mm_irqs_off() brought back an old bug
> regarding the use of preempt_enable_no_resched:
>
> As part of 62b94a08da1b ("sched/preempt: Take away
> preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules"), the definition of
> preempt_enable_no_resched() is only available in built-in code,
> not in loadable modules, so we can't generally use it from header
> files. However, the ARM version of finish_arch_post_lock_switch()
> calls preempt_enable_no_resched() and is defined as a static
> inline function in asm/mmu_context.h. This in turn means we cannot
> include asm/mmu_context.h from modules.
>
> With today's tip tree, asm/mmu_context.h gets included from
> linux/mmu_context.h, which is normally the exact pattern one would
> expect, but unfortunately, linux/mmu_context.h can be included from
> the vhost driver that is a loadable module, now causing this compile
> time error:
>
> In file included from ../include/linux/mmu_context.h:4:0,
>                   from ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:18:
> ../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In function 'finish_arch_post_lock_switch':
> ../arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h:88:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_enable_no_resched' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     preempt_enable_no_resched();
>
> Andy already tried to fix the bug by including linux/preempt.h
> from asm/mmu_context.h, but that didn't help. I suggested reordering
> the header files, which wasn't popular, but Steve came up with this
> workaround instead:
>
> The finish_arch_post_lock_switch() definition is now also hidden
> inside of #ifdef MODULE, so we don't see anything referencing
> preempt_enable_no_resched() from a header file. I've built a
> few hundred randconfig kernels with this, and did not see any
> new problems.
>
> Fixes: f98db6013c55 ("sched/core: Add switch_mm_irqs_off() and use it in the scheduler")
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>   arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index ed73babc0dc9..3cc14dd8587c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   		cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
>   }
>
> +#ifndef MODULE
>   #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch \
>   	finish_arch_post_lock_switch
>   static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
> @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
>   		preempt_enable_no_resched();
>   	}
>   }
> +#endif /* !MODULE */
>
>   #endif	/* CONFIG_MMU */
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-13 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-13 13:30 [PATCH] ARM: hide finish_arch_post_lock_switch from modules Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-13 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-13 13:51 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-05-13 13:51   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-05-13 14:15 ` [tip:sched/core] ARM: Hide finish_arch_post_lock_switch() " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5735DBC9.10204@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.