From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>,
OpenIPMI Developers <openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH v3 1/5] dmi: remove const from return of dmi_find_device
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 14:11:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573B6CCD.4050908@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrU=hJTebDFfvKPwGYCQv=4b_YdAdr-5j3LJGjMncAz6JA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/17/2016 11:44 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:04 AM, <minyard@acm.org> wrote:
>> From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
>>
>> A fwnode_handle is being added to dmi_device, and that will need to
>> be updated. So remove the const.
> Did this series ever land in a subsystem tree?
No, I have received no acks on it. I'd like to get it in 4.7.
-corey
> --Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> Openipmi-developer mailing list
> Openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 13:04 [PATCH v3 0/5] dmi: Rework to get IPMI autoloading from DMI tables minyard
2016-04-27 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dmi: remove const from return of dmi_find_device minyard
2016-05-17 16:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-17 19:11 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
2016-04-27 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dmi: Add a DMI firmware node and handling minyard
2016-04-27 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] dmi: Add IPMI DMI scanning to the DMI code minyard
2016-04-27 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] dmi: Add IPMI DMI devices as platform devices minyard
2016-04-27 13:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] ipmi: Convert DMI handling over to a platform device minyard
2016-09-07 22:37 ` [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH v3 0/5] dmi: Rework to get IPMI autoloading from DMI tables Corey Minyard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573B6CCD.4050908@acm.org \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.