All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gionatan Danti <assistenza@assyoma.it>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: 'Gionatan Danti' <assistenza@assyoma.it>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Unexptected filesytem unmount with thin provision and autoextend disabled - lvmetad crashed?
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 15:47:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573C726B.6020209@assyoma.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573B213E.7060807@redhat.com>

On 17/05/2016 15:48, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>
> Yes - in general - you've witnessed  general tool failure,
> and dmeventd is not 'smart' to recognize the reason of failure.
>
> Normally this 'error' should not happen.
>
> And while I'd even say there could have been a 'shortcut'
> without even reading VG 'metadata' - since there is profile support,
> it can't be known (100% threshold) without actually reading metadata
> (so it's quite tricky case anyway)
>

One question: I did some test (on another machine), deliberately 
killing/stopping the lvmetad service/socket. When the pool was almost 
full, the following entry was logged in /var/log/messages

WARNING: Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to internal scanning.

So it appears than when lvmetad is gracefully stopped/not running, 
dmeventd correctly resort to device scanning. On the other hand, in the 
previous case, lvmetad was running but returned "Connection refused". 
Should/could dmeventd resort to device scanning in this case also?

>
>
> Assuming you've been bitten by this one:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1334063
>
> possibly? targeted by this commit:
>
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/lvm2.git/commit/?id=7ef152c07290c79f47a64b0fc81975ae52554919
>

Very probable. So, after a LVM update, is best practice to restart the 
machine or at least the dmeventd/lvmetad services?

One more, somewhat related thing: when thin pool goes full, is a good 
thing to remount an ext3/4 in readonly mode (error=remount-ro). But what 
to do with XFS which, AFAIK, does not support a similar 
readonly-on-error policy?

It is my understanding that upstream XFS has some improvements to 
auto-shutdown in case of write errors. Did these improvements already 
tickle to production kernels (eg: RHEL6 and 7)?

Thanks.


-- 
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-18 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-15 10:33 [linux-lvm] Unexptected filesytem unmount with thin provision and autoextend disabled - lvmetad crashed? Gionatan Danti
2016-05-16 12:08 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-16 13:01   ` Xen
2016-05-16 14:09     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-16 19:25       ` Xen
2016-05-16 21:39         ` Xen
2016-05-17  9:43         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-17 17:17           ` Xen
2016-05-17 19:18             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-17 20:43               ` Xen
2016-05-17 22:26                 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-18  1:34                   ` Xen
2016-05-18 12:15                     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-17 13:09   ` Gionatan Danti
2016-05-17 13:48     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-18 13:47       ` Gionatan Danti [this message]
2016-05-24 13:45         ` Gionatan Danti
2016-05-24 14:17           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-05-24 14:28             ` Gionatan Danti
2016-05-24 17:17               ` Zdenek Kabelac
     [not found] <766997897.3926921.1463545271031.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2016-05-18  4:21 ` matthew patton
     [not found] <1872684910.4114972.1463547443287.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2016-05-18  4:57 ` matthew patton
2016-05-18 14:20   ` Xen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=573C726B.6020209@assyoma.it \
    --to=assistenza@assyoma.it \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.