From: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:19:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573EAC58.3030703@kyup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160519153339.GA16182@kroah.com>
On 05/19/2016 06:33 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:00:30PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> [Resending since I did mistyped the stable mailing list address]
>>
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/18/2016 06:10 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>>> Hello Greg,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Turns out building perf is broken in the 4.4 kernel tree on centos6.
>>>>>> Executing make in toosl/perf results in :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>>>>>> tests/llvm.c: In function ‘test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj’:
>>>>>> tests/llvm.c:53: error: declaration of ‘index’ shadows a global declaration
>>>>>> /usr/include/string.h:489: error: shadowed declaration is here
>>>>>> mv: cannot stat `tests/.llvm.o.tmp': No such file or directory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This can be fixed by applying the following commit:
>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=916d4092a1d2d7bb50630497be71ee4c4c2807fa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would it be possible to apply it for 4.4.12 otherwise using perf from
>>>>>> that tree is useless?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this something that recently broke? Or has it always been an issue?
>>>>
>>>> According to the Fixes tags in the commit this broke in the following
>>>> series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144681782820358
>>>>
>>>> Which was applied in November 6. 2015. So I'd say it's been fairly
>>>> recently.
>>>
>>> So it's always been broken in 4.4? Or did I break it in a newer
>>> release?
>>
>> Before that I was on 3.12 stable and everything worked, so I guess it
>> did break in the release which included the aforementioned patches.
>
> That's not what I need to know. Is 4.4.0 broken? If not, then I worry,
> if so, then there's not really anything interesting here. Unless 4.6.0
> also works. Does it?
Just tested, so 4.4.0 is broken, 4.6 works.
>
> We need some help narrowing this down if you want to see it resolved.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-20 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <573D5CF5.5050507@kyup.com>
2016-05-19 15:00 ` Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable Nikolay Borisov
2016-05-19 15:33 ` Greg KH
2016-05-20 6:19 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2016-05-20 6:28 ` Greg KH
2016-05-20 6:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-05-20 17:33 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573EAC58.3030703@kyup.com \
--to=kernel@kyup.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.