From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markos Chandras Subject: Re: Suggestions for the dpdk stable tree Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 22:02:13 +0100 Message-ID: <573F7B55.8050301@suse.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dev , Stephen Hemminger To: Christian Ehrhardt , "Mcnamara, John" Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E31BC33E for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 23:02:15 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, On 05/20/2016 04:54 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > it would be great to have an actively maintained LTS release. >=20 > Clearly all us "Distribution People" like Panu, Me and a few others sho= uld > - whenever bugs are identified as potential backports - start the > discussion. > And having an stable-maintainer on the other end sounds great. >=20 > The active maintainer you provide would do the usual auto-backport of f= ixes > once they come up upstream. > While us others would provide input from real exposure to users that fl= ows > in via bug tracking tools. >=20 > Looking forward for you coming back to the list once you have found one= . Yes that sounds like a very good idea indeed! --=20 markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norto= n HRB 21284 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, N=C3=BCrnberg