From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v1 1/1] test_robind: add "-f" mkfs option for xfs and btrfs
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 10:05:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57454EC5.7050700@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <977252429.1084123.1464157861719.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On 05/25/2016 09:31 AM, Jan Stancek wrote:
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
>> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Boyang Xue" <bxue@redhat.com>, "stanislav kholmanskikh" <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>, ltp@lists.linux.it
>> Sent: Tuesday, 24 May, 2016 5:26:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1 1/1] test_robind: add "-f" mkfs option for xfs and btrfs
>>
>> Hi!
>>> Alternative would be to zero-erase first blocks of LTP_BIG_DEV
>>> in runltp, but I'm not sure we want to assume that all tests
>>> are going to write over it.
>>>
>>> I found only 3 tests using LTP_BIG_DEV, this is the only
>>> one that is using xfs/btrfs, the other two are ext3/4.
>>
>> Or we can move the dd that erases first blocks from tst_acquire_device()
>> to tst_mkfs().
>
> I went to re-read why we are avoiding -f, and this does sound better
> than adding -f back.
If we move 'dd' to tst_mkfs(), then tst_acquire_device will return
"uncleared" devices, and mkfs_ext* test cases from runtest/commands will
start failing in our environment, i.e. we revert f79021c5d168256.
I'd ack the patch, since it affects only one test case.
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
>>
>> Or we can create an API function to get the path to big device and erase
>> it there...
>>
>> --
>> Cyril Hrubis
>> chrubis@suse.cz
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 7:49 [LTP] [PATCH v1 1/1] test_robind: add "-f" mkfs option for xfs and btrfs Boyang Xue
2016-05-24 14:01 ` Jan Stancek
2016-05-24 15:26 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-05-25 6:31 ` Jan Stancek
2016-05-25 7:05 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh [this message]
2016-05-25 14:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-06-17 4:28 ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-21 10:51 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-06-21 10:59 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57454EC5.7050700@oracle.com \
--to=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.