All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/11] ARM: allocate extra space for PSCI stack in secure section during link phase
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:51:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57472980.5020105@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464271273-23223-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org>

On 26/05/16 15:01, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> The PSCI implementation expects at most 2 pages worth of space reserved
> at the end of the secure section for its stacks. If PSCI is relocated to
> secure SRAM, then everything is fine. If no secure SRAM is available,
> and PSCI remains in main memory, the reserved memory space doesn't cover
> the space used by the stack.
> 
> If one accesses PSCI after Linux has fully booted, the memory that should
> have been reserved for the PSCI stacks may have been used by the kernel
> or userspace, and would be corrupted. Observed after effects include the
> system hanging or telinit core dumping when trying to reboot. It seems
> the init process gets hit the most on my test bed.
> 
> This fix allocates the space used by the PSCI stacks in the secure
> section by skipping pages in the linker script, but only when there is
> no secure SRAM, to avoid bloating the binary.
> 
> This fix is only a stop gap. It would be better to rework the stack
> allocation mechanism, maybe with proper usage of CONFIG_ macros and an
> explicit symbol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> 
> squash! ARM: allocate extra space for PSCI stack in secure section during link phase
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> index cfab8b041234..0770f8c878d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ SECTIONS
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE
>  #define CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE
> +#define __ARMV7_ALLOCATE_SECURE_STACK

ALLOCATE_SECURE_STACK is a bit of a misnomer, because nothing is secure
at all there (it is in RAM).

Something like PSCI_RAM_STACK would be more accurate.

>  #endif
>  
>  	.__secure_start : {
> @@ -67,6 +68,12 @@ SECTIONS
>  		SIZEOF(.__secure_start) +
>  		SIZEOF(.secure_text);
>  
> +#ifdef __ARMV7_ALLOCATE_SECURE_STACK
> +	/* Align to page boundary and skip 2 pages */
> +	. = (. & ~ 0xfff) + 0x2000;
> +#undef __ARMV7_ALLOCATE_SECURE_STACK
> +#endif
> +
>  	__secure_end_lma = .;
>  	.__secure_end : AT(__secure_end_lma) {
>  		*(.__secure_end)
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-26 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-26 14:01 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] sunxi: PSCI implementation rewrite in C Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/11] ARM: PSCI: use only r0 and r3 in psci_get_cpu_stack_top() Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 02/11] ARM: PSCI: save and restore clobbered registers in v7_flush_dcache_all Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: PSCI: export common PSCI function declarations for C code Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 16:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-27  4:29     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/11] ARM: allocate extra space for PSCI stack in secure section during link phase Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 16:51   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/11] sunxi: Make CPUCFG_BASE macro names the same across families Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/11] sunxi: Add packed attribute to struct sunxi_prcm_reg Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/11] sunxi: Add missing linux/types.h header for cpucfg_sun6i.h Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/11] sunxi: Group cpu core related controls together Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/11] sunxi: Add CPUCFG debug lock and sun7i cpu power controls Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/11] sunxi: Add base address for GIC Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 14:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/11] sunxi: Add PSCI implementation in C Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-05-26 17:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-27  4:22     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2016-06-03 18:26       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57472980.5020105@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.