Yes, checking if it exists makes more sense. And swapon is being used with 2> /dev/null as well in some places, better to change them also. I will send a V1 soon.
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Ming Liu <liu.ming50@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ming Liu <peter.x.liu@external.atlascopco.com>
To avoid reporting errors when swapoff does not exist.
Signed-off-by: Ming Liu <peter.x.liu@external.atlascopco.com>
This will suppress *real* errors as well. Better to just check if swapoff exists and then run it if it does, if that's a concern.
--
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics