From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Bill Irwin <wli@holomorphy.com>,
haveblue@us.ibm.com
Subject: Overhead of highpte
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 15:53:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574790000.1057186404@flay> (raw)
Some people were saying they couldn't see an overhead with highpte.
Seems pretty obvious to me still. It should help *more* on the NUMA
box, as PTEs become node-local.
The kmap_atomic is, of course, perfectly understandable. The increase
in the rmap functions is a bit of a mystery to me.
M.
Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.5.73-mm3 45.38 114.91 565.81 1497.75
2.5.73-mm3-highpte 46.54 130.41 566.84 1498.00
(note system time)
1480 9.1% total
1236 52.7% page_remove_rmap
113 18.5% page_add_rmap
90 150.0% kmap_atomic
89 54.6% kmem_cache_free
45 15.0% zap_pte_range
37 0.0% kmap_atomic_to_page
28 87.5% __pte_chain_free
26 216.7% kunmap_atomic
17 13.4% release_pages
12 10.5% file_move
11 42.3% filemap_nopage
10 13.7% handle_mm_fault
...
-10 -16.1% generic_file_open
-10 -5.2% atomic_dec_and_lock
-13 -2.4% __copy_to_user_ll
-13 -3.7% find_get_page
-13 -7.0% path_lookup
-21 -2.6% __d_lookup
-36 -78.3% page_address
-49 -74.2% pte_alloc_one
-104 -2.2% default_idle
SDET 32 (see disclaimer)
Throughput Std. Dev
2.5.73-mm3 100.0% 0.8%
2.5.73-mm3-highpte 95.3% 0.1%
(highpte hung above 32 load).
971 5.5% total
399 3.9% default_idle
329 23.1% page_remove_rmap
124 15.6% page_add_rmap
119 94.4% kmem_cache_free
39 205.3% kmap_atomic
24 9.8% release_pages
21 131.2% __pte_chain_free
15 1500.0% kmap_atomic_to_page
13 76.5% __kmalloc
11 183.3% kunmap_atomic
...
-10 -35.7% __copy_from_user_ll
-10 -3.9% find_get_page
-16 -11.7% .text.lock.filemap
-16 -45.7% page_address
-16 -18.2% atomic_dec_and_lock
-40 -74.1% pte_alloc_one
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-02 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-02 22:53 Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-07-02 23:15 ` Overhead of highpte William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 0:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04 2:34 ` Dave Hansen
2003-07-04 2:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-04 2:54 ` Dave Hansen
2003-07-04 3:53 ` Overhead of highpte (or not :) Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574790000.1057186404@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.