From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vikrams@codeaurora.org>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>,
Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/acpi: Fix the deadlock in function vgic_lock_rank()
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:11:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574D6351.9090207@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1605311034590.3896@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Hi Stefano,
On 31/05/16 10:40, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
>> ACPI can only be enabled in expert mode and will be a tech-preview for Xen
>> 4.7. So I would revert the patch. SPIs will not be routed, but it is better
>> than a deadlock.
>>
>> I would also replace the patch with a warning until the issue will be fixed in
>> Xen 4.8.
>>
>> Any opinions?
>>
>>> +int gic_route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>>> + struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int priority)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> + int lock = 0, retval;
>>> + struct vgic_irq_rank *rank;
>>> +
>>> + /* Use vcpu0 to retrieve the pending_irq struct. Given that we only
>>> + * route SPIs to guests, it doesn't make any difference. */
>>> + rank = vgic_rank_irq(d->vcpu[0], virq);
>>> +
>>> + /* Take the rank spinlock unless it has already been taken by the
>>> + * caller. */
>>> + if ( !spin_is_locked(&rank->lock) ) {
>>
>> AFAICT, spin_is_locked only tell us that someone has locked the rank. So this
>> would be unsafe.
>
> The code is checking if the lock is already taken, and if it is not
> taken, it will take the lock. The purpose of this code is to
> allow gic_route_irq_to_guest to be called by both functions which
> already have the lock held and functions that do not. The same goal
> could be achieved by duplicating gic_route_irq_to_guest into two
> identical functions except for the lock taking. That would be
> admittedly a more obvious fix but also a particularly ugly one.
spin_is_locked does not work as you expect. The function will not tell
you if the lock was taken by the current CPU, but if the lock was taken
by *a* CPU.
It would be possible to have CPU A calling this function and have CPU B
with the lock taken. So the data structure would be accessed by 2 CPUs
concurrently, which is unsafe.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-31 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-27 0:39 [PATCH] arm/acpi: Fix the deadlock in function vgic_lock_rank() Shanker Donthineni
2016-05-27 13:56 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-30 13:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-05-30 19:45 ` Julien Grall
2016-05-31 0:55 ` Shannon Zhao
2016-05-31 9:40 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-05-31 10:11 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-06-01 9:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-06-01 10:49 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 13:55 ` Shannon Zhao
2016-05-31 11:37 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574D6351.9090207@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=Wei.Chen@arm.com \
--cc=pelcan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=vikrams@codeaurora.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.