All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Netbal <wolfgang.netbal@sigmatek.at>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: [Xenomai] Performance impact after switching from 2.6.2.1 to 2.6.4
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:09:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574D9B03.8080706@sigmatek.at> (raw)

Dear all,

we have moved our application from "XENOMAI 2.6.2.1 + Linux 3.0.43" to 
"XENOMAI 2.6.4. + Linux 3.10.53". Our target is an i.MX6DL. The system 
is now up and running and works stable. Unfortunately we see a 
difference in the performance. Our old combination (XENOMAI 2.6.2.1 + 
Linux 3.0.43) was slightly faster.

At the moment it looks like that XENOMAI 2.6.4 calls 
xnpod_schedule_handler much more often then XENOMAI 2.6.2.1 in our old 
system.  Every call of xnpod_schedule_handler interrupts our main 
XENOMAI task with priority = 95.

I have compared the configuration of both XENOMAI versions but did not 
found any difference. I checked the source code (new commits) but did 
also not find a solution.


Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-- 
Wolfgang Netbal
Softwareentwicklung
________________________________

SIGMATEK GmbH & Co KG
Sigmatekstraße 1
5112 Lamprechtshausen
Österreich / Austria

Tel.: +43/6274/4321-0
Fax: +43/6274/4321-300
E-Mail: wolfgang.netbal@sigmatek.at
http://www.sigmatek-automation.at

****************************Please note: ****************************
This email and all attachments are confidential and intended solely
for the person or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
named addressee you must not make this email and all attachments
accessible to any other person. If you have received this email in
error please delete it together with all attachments.
*********************************************************************


             reply	other threads:[~2016-05-31 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 14:09 Wolfgang Netbal [this message]
2016-05-31 14:16 ` [Xenomai] Performance impact after switching from 2.6.2.1 to 2.6.4 Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-01 13:52   ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-01 14:12     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-02  8:15       ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-02  8:23         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-06  7:03           ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-06 15:35             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-07 14:13               ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-07 17:00                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-27 15:55                   ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-27 16:00                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28  8:08                       ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-27 16:46                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28  8:31                       ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28  8:34                         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28  9:15                           ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28  9:17                             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28  9:28                               ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28  9:29                                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28  9:51                                   ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28  9:55                                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28 10:10                                       ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28 10:19                                         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28 10:31                                           ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28 10:39                                             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28 11:45                                               ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28 11:57                                                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28 11:55                                               ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28 12:01                                                 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-28 14:32                                                   ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-28 14:42                                                     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-30  9:17                                                       ` Wolfgang Netbal
2016-06-30  9:39                                                         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2016-06-07 17:22                 ` Philippe Gerum
2016-05-31 15:08 ` Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574D9B03.8080706@sigmatek.at \
    --to=wolfgang.netbal@sigmatek.at \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.