Re: git gc and worktrees

[Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>]

Am 01.06.2016 um 00:14 schrieb Jeff King:
> Right, we use the index for reachability checks (both in "prune", but
> also during a "repack -a", which uses the revision parser's
> '--indexed-objects" option). That obviously should handle per-worktree
> index files, but I don't know whether it currently does.

Thanks. Here's a test case to make sure that --indexed-objects looks at
the indexes of separate worktrees. I'm not submitting a proper patch
because I don't feel like being able to fix the problem and I'm not
sure what the expected order of the listed objects is.

diff --git a/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh b/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh
index 3e752ce..dbd3679 100755
--- a/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh
+++ b/t/t6000-rev-list-misc.sh
@@ -96,6 +96,34 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list can show index objects' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success '--indexed-objects in the index of a separate worktrees' '
+	# see also the comments in the previous case
+	cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+	8e4020bb5a8d8c873b25de15933e75cc0fc275df one
+	d9d3a7417b9605cfd88ee6306b28dadc29e6ab08 only-in-index
+	2043d83f5a374f119437856d2f1773c936938876 only-in-wt-index
+	9200b628cf9dc883a85a7abc8d6e6730baee589c two
+	EOF
+	echo only-in-index >only-in-index &&
+	git add only-in-index &&
+
+	git worktree add -b side wt &&
+	test_when_finished "rm -r wt; git worktree prune" &&
+	(
+		cd wt &&
+		echo only-in-wt-index >only-in-wt-index &&
+		git add only-in-wt-index &&
+
+		# this must also include the objects of the main worktree
+		git rev-list --objects --indexed-objects >../actual
+	) &&
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+
+	# same result when invoked from the main worktree
+	git rev-list --objects --indexed-objects >actual &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
 test_expect_success '--bisect and --first-parent can not be combined' '
 	test_must_fail git rev-list --bisect --first-parent HEAD
 '