From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: xen-pciback: Remove create_workqueue
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:53:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574EF6D5.2050006@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160601141508.GA27853@Karyakshetra>
On 01/06/16 15:15, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
> for a long time now and there's no reason to use dedicated workqueues
> just to gain concurrency. Replace dedicated xen_pcibk_wq with the
> use of system_wq.
>
> Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue created with create_workqueue(),
> system_wq allows multiple work items to overlap executions even on
> the same CPU; however, a per-cpu workqueue doesn't have any CPU
> locality or global ordering guarantees unless the target CPU is
> explicitly specified and thus the increase of local concurrency shouldn't
> make any difference.
>
> Since the work items could be pending, flush_work() has been used in
> xen_pcibk_disconnect(). xen_pcibk_xenbus_remove() calls free_pdev()
> which in turn calls xen_pcibk_disconnect() for every pdev to ensure that
> there is no pending task while disconnecting the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -Changed cancel_work_sync to flush_work
> -Changed commit description
>
> Feedback to update a comment was received in v1 from David Vrabel. It has not
> be included in v2 since some clarification was required. Will include it in
> v3 once the details about the content and the placement of the comment are
> received.
The comment needed updating iff this continued to use cancel_work_sync()
but since it's using flush_work() the comment is fine.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-01 14:15 [PATCH v2] xen: xen-pciback: Remove create_workqueue Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-06-01 14:53 ` David Vrabel
2016-06-01 14:53 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2016-06-01 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-01 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-28 16:46 ` Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-06-28 16:46 ` Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-06-29 12:49 ` David Vrabel
2016-06-29 12:49 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574EF6D5.2050006@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=bhaktipriya96@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.