All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	=Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>,
	Vikram Sethi <vikrams@codeaurora.org>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm/acpi: Add Server Base System Architecture UART support
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:51:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575047FD.3040705@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574F0AE7.3060701@arm.com>



On 06/01/2016 11:18 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 01/06/16 16:56, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>>> I would like to support both the interfaces
>>>> (ACPI_DBG2_SBSA_32/ACPI_DBG2_SBSA) If you are okay.
>>>
>>> I am a bit puzzled, so your UART is only supporting 32-bit access (i.e
>>> no 16-bit and 8-bit access)?
>>
>> Just to clarify: the SBSA spec is not very clear in this respect, as it
>> only speaks of "a set of 32-bit registers". But this has been
>> interpreted as "supports 32-bit accesses". So there was a patch lately
>> in Linux to change all accesses to SBSA UARTs to 32-bit accessors
>> (writel/readl), because there is at least this one mentioned platform
>> that requires this, while all the other relevant platforms we could get
>> hold of can also cope with 32-bit accesses. This may not be true for all
>> legacy PL011 implementations out there, but for the SBSA subset this is
>> deemed a safe assumption.
>
> Thank you for the explanation.
>
>> So if possible we should switch to 32-bit accessors for the SBSA UART.
>
> The driver use 32-bit accessors exclusively.
>
>>
>>> If so your platform is based on SBSA v2.3, and therefore the PL011
>>> driver needs more modification to support properly your platform. For
>>> instance, the register UARTMIS is not present in v2.3 but used by the
>>> driver.
>>
>> I think this has been changed in the spec lately, it was present in
>> earlier revisions of the spec.
>
> If so, I would replace the read to UARTMIS by a combination UARTIMSC and UARTRIS to avoid any issue with the UART based on SBSA v2.3.
>
I'll change the code to use registers UARTIMSC and UARTRIS instead of  UARTMIS.
> Cheers,
>

-- 
Shanker Donthineni
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-02 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 14:02 [PATCH v2] arm/acpi: Add Server Base System Architecture UART support Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-01  6:47 ` Wei Chen
2016-06-01 12:21   ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-01 13:49 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 15:14   ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-01 15:40     ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 15:56       ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-01 16:18         ` Julien Grall
2016-06-02 14:51           ` Shanker Donthineni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575047FD.3040705@codeaurora.org \
    --to=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=Wei.Chen@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=pelcan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=vikrams@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.