From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix iodepth_batch=0
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:40:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57506FA2.9030704@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160602173134.GA9588@vader.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On 06/02/2016 11:31 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:45:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 06/01/2016 01:04 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>>> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>>>
>>> The man page claims that iodepth_batch=0 falls back to whatever was
>>> specified for iodepth, but the enforced minimum of 1 means that 0 is not
>>> actually valid.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a2e6f8ac56a9 ("Make iodepth_batch=1 by default")
>>> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>>
>> Probably a better idea to just adjust the check-and-set instead, ala the
>> below:
>>
>> diff --git a/init.c b/init.c
>> index 7166ea766d8a..e82446ba6f2a 100644
>> --- a/init.c
>> +++ b/init.c
>> @@ -695,7 +695,8 @@ static int fixup_options(struct thread_data *td)
>> /*
>> * If batch number isn't set, default to the same as iodepth
>> */
>> - if (o->iodepth_batch > o->iodepth || !o->iodepth_batch)
>> + if (o->iodepth_batch > o->iodepth ||
>> + !fio_option_is_set(o, iodepth_batch))
>> o->iodepth_batch = o->iodepth;
>>
>> /*
>
> I wasn't trying to change the default (which is currently 1), just trying to
> fix the discrepancy between the man page:
>
> iodepth_batch=int, iodepth_batch_submit=int
> This defines how many pieces of IO to submit at once. It defaults to 1
> which means that we submit each IO as soon as it is available, but can
> be raised to submit bigger batches of IO at the time. If it is set to 0
> the iodepth value will be used.
>
> and the actual behavior:
>
> # ./fio --name=test --filename=/dev/nullb0 --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=8 --iodepth_batch=0 --runtime=1 --time_based
> min value out of range: 0 (1 min)
> fio: failed parsing iodepth_batch=0
Ah gotcha, I think your patch will do nicely for that, and re-instate
the documented behavior. Added, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-01 7:04 [PATCH] Fix iodepth_batch=0 Omar Sandoval
2016-06-02 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
2016-06-02 17:31 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-06-02 17:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57506FA2.9030704@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.