From: Alexey Bogdanenko <abogdanenko@ecotelecom.ru>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: QoS grinder vs pipe wrr_tokens
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 20:28:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57570458.1080208@ecotelecom.ru> (raw)
Hello,
I have a question regarding QoS grinder implementation, specifically,
about the way queue WRR tokens are copied from pipe to grinder and back.
First, rte_sched_grinder uses uint16_t and rte_sched_pipe uses uint8_t
to represent wrr_tokens. Second, instead of just copying the tokens, we
shift bits by RTE_SCHED_WRR_SHIFT.
What does it accomplish? Can it lead to lower scheduler accuracy due to
a round-off error?
version: v16.04
Thanks,
Alexey Bogdanenko
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-07 17:28 Alexey Bogdanenko [this message]
2016-06-08 15:23 ` QoS grinder vs pipe wrr_tokens Dumitrescu, Cristian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57570458.1080208@ecotelecom.ru \
--to=abogdanenko@ecotelecom.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.