From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCHJP-0004E8-Ui for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:09:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bCHJN-0000Sy-Vi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:09:10 -0400 Message-ID: <575E16BF.4000701@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:13:19 +0800 From: Changlong Xie MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1465348292-26750-1-git-send-email-xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <57581F72.5060101@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <57581F72.5060101@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v20 00/10] Block replication for continuous checkpoints List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , qemu devel , Stefan Hajnoczi , Fam Zheng , Max Reitz , Kevin Wolf , Jeff Cody Cc: qemu block , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow , Markus Armbruster , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Dong Eddie , Jiang Yunhong , zhanghailiang , Gonglei , Wen Congyang On 06/08/2016 09:36 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/07/2016 07:11 PM, Changlong Xie wrote: >> Block replication is a very important feature which is used for >> continuous checkpoints(for example: COLO). >> > > Side note: Including qemu-trivial in CC: on a patch series at v20 feels > wrong. Obviously it is not trivial to be ten patches with this much churn. > To avoid bothering qemu-trivial maintainers, i'll resend the patch sets until you have some comments on [PATCH V20 07/10]. Thanks -Xie