From: Philipp Hahn <hahn@univention.de>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@citrix.com>,
"Nico Stöckigt" <Stoeckigt@univention.de>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <Xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.1.6.1] SIGSEGV libxc/xc_save_domain.c: p2m_size >> configured_ram_size
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:14:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575E9594.9010708@univention.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZbfhrZY=RSZ0NEwLu2vvAfKNtvS0=BgHFWuYAEmnA+O4g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Georg,
first of all thank you for answering.
Am 13.06.2016 um 12:15 schrieb George Dunlap:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Philipp Hahn <hahn@univention.de> wrote:
>> while trying to live migrate some VMs from an xen-4.1.6.1 host "xc_save"
>> crashes with a segmentation fault in tools/libxc/xc_domain_save.c:1141
>>> /*
>>> * Quick belt and braces sanity check.
>>> */
>>> for ( i = 0; i < dinfo->p2m_size; i++ )
>>> {
>>> mfn = pfn_to_mfn(i);
>>> if( (mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY) && (mfn_to_pfn(mfn) != i) )
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> due to a de-reference through
>>> #define pfn_to_mfn(_pfn) \
>>> ((xen_pfn_t) ((dinfo->guest_width==8) \
>>> ? (((uint64_t *)ctx->live_p2m)[(_pfn)]) \
>>> : ((((uint32_t *)ctx->live_p2m)[(_pfn)]) == 0xffffffffU \
>>> ? (-1UL) : (((uint32_t *)ctx->live_p2m)[(_pfn)]))))
...
> Given that 4.1 is long out of support, we won't be making a proper fix
> in-tree (since it will never be released).
I know that 4.1 is EOL.
I'm aware of Ubuntu still having xen-4.1 in one of their LTS versions
(Precise) and its also in Debian-oldstable, which a lot people (us
included) still use. I would prefer to update, but I can for reasons
outside my direct control.
I'm already working with Stefan Bader from Canonical to backport most of
the XSAs to 4.1, so there already exists a "better" version outside of
the official Xen repositories.
> So what kind of resolution
> would be the most help to you? A patch you can apply locally to allow
> the save/restore to work?
A patch is okay. I've already fixed a lot other bugs in xen-4.1 by
patching the last release, so compiling my own version is no problem for me.
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 15:22 [xen-4.1.6.1] SIGSEGV libxc/xc_save_domain.c: p2m_size >> configured_ram_size Philipp Hahn
2016-06-13 10:15 ` George Dunlap
2016-06-13 11:14 ` Philipp Hahn [this message]
2016-06-17 9:31 ` Xen 4.1 maintenance? (Was Re: [xen-4.1.6.1] SIGSEGV libxc/xc_save_domain.c: p2m_size >> configured_ram_size) George Dunlap
2016-06-29 9:46 ` Stefan Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575E9594.9010708@univention.de \
--to=hahn@univention.de \
--cc=Stoeckigt@univention.de \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.