All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <christian.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:33:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <575EB62F.4010107@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465824332-10628-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On 06/13/2016 03:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> kvm->online_vcpus is only updated at the very end of KVM_CREATE_VCPU.
> Thus, it can be racy to use it as a check for "has any VCPU been created
> already?".  While x86 detects the race through kvm_vcpu_compatible,
> it is kinda hackish and s390 does not do anything similar.  Provide a
> better fix for both.
> 
> Paolo Bonzini (3):
>   KVM: introduce created_vcpus
>   KVM: remove kvm_vcpu_compatible
>   KVM: s390: use created_vcpus
> 
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig     |  1 -
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c       | 11 +++--------
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------
>  virt/kvm/Kconfig         |  3 ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 

>From a quick look this looks "the right thing". Will do a proper review
later this day or tomorrow.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-13 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-13 13:25 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: introduce kvm->created_vcpus Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 14:43   ` Cornelia Huck
2016-06-13 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: remove kvm_vcpu_compatible Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 13:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-13 14:36   ` Cornelia Huck
2016-06-13 13:33 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2016-06-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Cornelia Huck
2016-06-15 22:00   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16  7:30     ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-06-16  7:59       ` Cornelia Huck
2016-06-16  8:23         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-16  8:07       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=575EB62F.4010107@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=christian.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.