From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:10:14 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa In-Reply-To: <20160613101233.GB1605@arm.com> References: <1465286898-13828-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20160607135852.GA20477@arm.com> <575D0ABA.2010503@huawei.com> <20160613101233.GB1605@arm.com> Message-ID: <575FD806.5090600@huawei.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2016/6/13 18:12, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:09:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2016/6/7 21:58, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:08:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >>>> v3 -> v4: >>>> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8. >>>> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64. >>>> >>>> v2 -> v3: >>>> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the >>>> patches looks more well. The final code have no change. >>>> >>>> v1 -> v2: >>>> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679 >>> If you want bug fixes to land in 4.7, you'll need to base them on a >>> mainline kernel. >>> >> Rafael queued ARM64 ACPI NUMA support for 4.8, and this patch set is based >> on that with no urgent bugfixes, can this patch set be queued for 4.8? > Up to Catalin, since he's handling the 4.8 merge window. It would be really > nice if you could give us the heads up about dependencies like this in the > future, preferably *before* the base part has already been merged. That way, > it's easier to create shared topic branches and gives us more options if > we think that conflicts are likely to occur. Understood the maintenance difficulty will have, will do that next time. Much appreciate if it can be merged for 4.8. Thanks Hanjun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:10:14 +0800 Message-ID: <575FD806.5090600@huawei.com> References: <1465286898-13828-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20160607135852.GA20477@arm.com> <575D0ABA.2010503@huawei.com> <20160613101233.GB1605@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160613101233.GB1605-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas Cc: Zhen Lei , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Robert Richter , David Daney , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Grant Likely , devicetree , linux-kernel , Zefan Li , Xinwei Hu , Tianhong Ding List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2016/6/13 18:12, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:09:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2016/6/7 21:58, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:08:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >>>> v3 -> v4: >>>> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8. >>>> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64. >>>> >>>> v2 -> v3: >>>> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the >>>> patches looks more well. The final code have no change. >>>> >>>> v1 -> v2: >>>> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679 >>> If you want bug fixes to land in 4.7, you'll need to base them on a >>> mainline kernel. >>> >> Rafael queued ARM64 ACPI NUMA support for 4.8, and this patch set is based >> on that with no urgent bugfixes, can this patch set be queued for 4.8? > Up to Catalin, since he's handling the 4.8 merge window. It would be really > nice if you could give us the heads up about dependencies like this in the > future, preferably *before* the base part has already been merged. That way, > it's easier to create shared topic branches and gives us more options if > we think that conflicts are likely to occur. Understood the maintenance difficulty will have, will do that next time. Much appreciate if it can be merged for 4.8. Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752050AbcFNKLm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:11:42 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:34177 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751494AbcFNKLk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:11:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa To: Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas References: <1465286898-13828-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20160607135852.GA20477@arm.com> <575D0ABA.2010503@huawei.com> <20160613101233.GB1605@arm.com> CC: Zhen Lei , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Robert Richter , "David Daney" , Rob Herring , "Frank Rowand" , Grant Likely , devicetree , linux-kernel , Zefan Li , Xinwei Hu , Tianhong Ding From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: <575FD806.5090600@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:10:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160613101233.GB1605@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.17.188] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.575FD815.0017,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ba62d36ec6a0e00e7b9f3d1847263564 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016/6/13 18:12, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:09:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2016/6/7 21:58, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:08:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >>>> v3 -> v4: >>>> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8. >>>> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64. >>>> >>>> v2 -> v3: >>>> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the >>>> patches looks more well. The final code have no change. >>>> >>>> v1 -> v2: >>>> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679 >>> If you want bug fixes to land in 4.7, you'll need to base them on a >>> mainline kernel. >>> >> Rafael queued ARM64 ACPI NUMA support for 4.8, and this patch set is based >> on that with no urgent bugfixes, can this patch set be queued for 4.8? > Up to Catalin, since he's handling the 4.8 merge window. It would be really > nice if you could give us the heads up about dependencies like this in the > future, preferably *before* the base part has already been merged. That way, > it's easier to create shared topic branches and gives us more options if > we think that conflicts are likely to occur. Understood the maintenance difficulty will have, will do that next time. Much appreciate if it can be merged for 4.8. Thanks Hanjun