diff for duplicates of <575FEFF1.9020105@semihalf.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e697f40..d499b75 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -253,7 +253,3 @@ PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY); Personally I think that (2) is better, no need for macro definitions. Tomasz --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in -the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e5938f3..b1f086f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -32,7 +32,13 @@ linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org - " Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>\0" + Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> + Andrea Gallo <andrea.gallo@linaro.org> + jeremy.linton@arm.com + Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com> + Chenxin (Charles) <charles.chenxin@huawei.com> + Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com> + " liudong-1989@163.com <liudong-1989@163.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 14.06.2016 11:45, Dongdong Liu wrote:\n" @@ -289,10 +295,6 @@ "PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);\n" "\n" "Personally I think that (2) is better, no need for macro definitions.\n" - "Tomasz\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-acpi\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + Tomasz -1214995397cec5894c2b7b7748fd7acb2c2d08a38a34c5970b35bd38bfcfad93 +bf98fe6c9b075c4d78c24c2fea982590d2184da9d0540a06498d8d36d60434b5
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index e697f40..7af9b15 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ On 14.06.2016 11:45, Dongdong Liu wrote: > Hi Duc > -> 在 2016/6/14 17:00, Duc Dang 写道: +> ? 2016/6/14 17:00, Duc Dang ??: >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Dongdong Liu >> <liudongdong3@huawei.com> wrote: >>> Hi Duc >>> ->>> 在 2016/6/14 4:57, Duc Dang 写道: +>>> ? 2016/6/14 4:57, Duc Dang ??: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Christopher Covington >>>> <cov@codeaurora.org> wrote: @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ On 14.06.2016 11:45, Dongdong Liu wrote: > > > This should change to { ops, oem_id, oem_table_id, rev, dom, bus }; -> ‘#’ is not need. +> ?#? is not need. Both solutions are OK. @@ -253,7 +253,3 @@ PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY); Personally I think that (2) is better, no need for macro definitions. Tomasz --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in -the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index e5938f3..2707c0d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -5,45 +5,21 @@ "ref\0575F9B4D.8080501@huawei.com\0" "ref\0CADaLND=esW9rwrfdKtAvkyPhCs4F9hMH9LDY4DWTpOv0ZgoT9w@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\0575FD253.3070508@huawei.com\0" - "From\0Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH V2 1/2] ACPI/PCI: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific ECAM quirks\0" + "From\0tn@semihalf.com (Tomasz Nowicki)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] ACPI/PCI: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific ECAM quirks\0" "Date\0Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:52:17 +0200\0" - "To\0Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>" - " Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>\0" - "Cc\0Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>" - Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> - Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com> - okaya@codeaurora.org - Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com> - robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com - Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> - Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> - Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> - linux-pci@vger.kernel.org - linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> - linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org - Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org - " Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 14.06.2016 11:45, Dongdong Liu wrote:\n" "> Hi Duc\n" ">\n" - "> \345\234\250 2016/6/14 17:00, Duc Dang \345\206\231\351\201\223:\n" + "> ? 2016/6/14 17:00, Duc Dang ??:\n" ">> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Dongdong Liu\n" ">> <liudongdong3@huawei.com> wrote:\n" ">>> Hi Duc\n" ">>>\n" - ">>> \345\234\250 2016/6/14 4:57, Duc Dang \345\206\231\351\201\223:\n" + ">>> ? 2016/6/14 4:57, Duc Dang ??:\n" ">>>>\n" ">>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Christopher Covington\n" ">>>> <cov@codeaurora.org> wrote:\n" @@ -256,7 +232,7 @@ ">\n" ">\n" "> This should change to { ops, oem_id, oem_table_id, rev, dom, bus };\n" - "> \342\200\230#\342\200\231 is not need.\n" + "> ?#? is not need.\n" "\n" "Both solutions are OK.\n" "\n" @@ -289,10 +265,6 @@ "PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);\n" "\n" "Personally I think that (2) is better, no need for macro definitions.\n" - "Tomasz\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-acpi\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + Tomasz -1214995397cec5894c2b7b7748fd7acb2c2d08a38a34c5970b35bd38bfcfad93 +9f56156ce5a2aa1286869e26fcff5b7a566b3e92e3a6957ff141f371c49e5f07
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.