From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <5734A9F8.10305@siemens.com> <20160512163142.GC18298@hermes.click-hack.org> <5734B43B.4040001@siemens.com> <20160512165904.GF18298@hermes.click-hack.org> <20160512171246.GG18298@hermes.click-hack.org> <5734BA9B.1030503@siemens.com> <20160512182049.GQ13285@hermes.click-hack.org> <5734CA76.5000606@siemens.com> <5734CCF8.5090508@xenomai.org> <5734CE80.60707@siemens.com> <5734D4B9.4070900@xenomai.org> <5734D92F.1000206@siemens.com> <57350331.1020302@xenomai.org> <57356C0E.6080205@siemens.com> <5735D8E0.3040202@xenomai.org> <5735F39A.8050204@siemens.com> <57601E35.3010101@siemens.com> <5a98b862-5b1f-449c-8989-f7e3d4fe8255@xenomai.org> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <57603B1C.6070301@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:13:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5a98b862-5b1f-449c-8989-f7e3d4fe8255@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] RTDM syscalls & switching List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum , Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Xenomai On 2016-06-14 17:23, Philippe Gerum wrote: > Restoring the original behavior unconditionally would not be a fix but > only a work-around for your own issue. Finding a better way acceptable > to all parties is on my todo list for the upcoming 3.0.3. An alternative design to a plain revert of the current->conforming switch could be to enhance conforming to take the scheduling class into account: SCHED_WEAK and SCHED_OTHER should have a NRT as conforming domain while real-time scheduling classes obviously target RT. But I didn't check yet what side effects that may have, nor if there could be relevant impact on syscall performance (unlikely, though). Jan