From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:32:02 +0100
Subject: Versatile Express randomly fails to boot - Versatile Express to
 be removed from nightly testing
In-Reply-To: <1465982868.2829.20.camel@linaro.org>
References: <20150330140333.GJ24899@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <55196228.5050805@arm.com> <20150330150552.GK24899@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <55196E31.80803@arm.com> <551AD902.9090401@arm.com>
 <20150402141336.GI24899@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <551D7EAB.1000200@arm.com>
 <1465918285.2840.41.camel@linaro.org>
 <20160614155220.GB1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <5760346A.10903@arm.com>
 <20160614164944.GC1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
 <1465982868.2829.20.camel@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <57612092.2070504@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org



On 15/06/16 10:27, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:49 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:44:26PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Even with higher latency if the platform is unusable, I agree to remove.
>>> If you think it's usable with the updated latency(<2 2 1>) then we can
>>> update it.
>>
>> The kernels I'm booting have that updated latency.  It used to improve
>> things, but for most of this year, it fails most boot attempts.  Out
>> of the last 21 boot attempts, all 21 attempts failed with the above
>> latency value.
>

[...]

>
> That didn't fix things, but I noticed this morning there are PL310
> errata workarounds too that we should have enabled:
>
> PL310_ERRATA_769419
> PL310_ERRATA_727915
> PL310_ERRATA_588369
>

I had all the above enabled in my config which doesn't help either.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep