From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
keyhaede@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:51:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576276A6.6040904@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5dbb935d-2d9a-48fe-79c7-8e8f57b27678@phrozen.org>
On 06/16/2016 11:44 AM, John Crispin wrote:
> On 16/06/2016 07:20, David Miller wrote:
>> From: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:58:46 +0200
>>
>>> This series contains 2 small code cleanups that are leftovers from the
>>> MIPS support. There is also a small fix that adds proper locking to the
>>> code accessing the IRQ registers. Without this fix we saw deadlocks caused
>>> by the last patch of the series, which adds IRQ grouping. The grouping
>>> feature allows us to use different IRQs for TX and RX. By doing so we can
>>> use affinity to let the SoC handle the IRQs on different cores.
>>
>> This patch series doesn't apply cleanly to the net-next tree, I get rejects
>> on patch #4.
>
> it depends on the series with the 11 fixes that i sent last week which
> is however in the net tree and not the next tree (i also still had the
> DQL hack in my tree). if i resend this at the start of the next rc1
> would you merge it into the net tree so that it becomes part of v4.8 ?
Well, it would rather require a merge of -net into -net-next then. But
that would be useful indeed.
Cheers,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-15 14:58 [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] net-next: mediatek: add IRQ locking John Crispin
[not found] ` <1466002730-58476-1-git-send-email-john-Pj+rj9U5foFAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] net-next: mediatek: remove superfluous register reads John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] net-next: mediatek: don't use intermediate variables to store IRQ masks John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] net-next: mediatek: add support for IRQ grouping John Crispin
2016-06-15 14:58 ` John Crispin
2016-06-16 5:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] net-next: mediatek: IRQ cleanups, fixes and grouping David Miller
2016-06-16 9:44 ` John Crispin
2016-06-16 9:51 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2016-06-17 0:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576276A6.6040904@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=keyhaede@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.