From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: allow building with kcov coverage on ARM64
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:47:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576283B9.9050900@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160615142550.GA7971@leverpostej>
On 15/06/16 15:25, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:16:08PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I built and booted (via EFI) a kernel with this feature enabled (also
>>>>>> with the boot/Makefile change removed). I haven't tested the feature
>>>>>> itself as such, as I'm not sure how to do that.
>>>>> You can test it by running the test program from Documentation/kcov.txt.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, I hadn't spotted that. If I get the chance I'll try to give that a
>>>> go.
>>>
>>> I just had a go (with this applied atop of v4.7-rc3), and I get:
>>>
>>> root at ribbensteg:/home/nanook# ./kcov
>>> mmap: No such device
>>>
>>> The device exists (it was able to open the fd, evidently):
>>>
>>> root at ribbensteg:/home/nanook# ls -al /sys/kernel/debug/kcov
>>> -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 /sys/kernel/debug/kcov
>>>
>>> Strace show me:
>>>
>>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/kernel/debug/kcov", O_RDWR) = 3
>>> ioctl(3, CHIOMOVE or CM_IOCGATR, 0x10000) = 0
>>> mmap(NULL, 524288, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like the error paths in kcov_mmap are hitting.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>> According to Dmitry (thanks, Dmitry!) this has regressed recently, but
>> there's a pending patch that should probably fix the problem:
>> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1605.2/04379.html
>
> Thanks for the pointer! With that applied, the program runs.
>
> However, it looks like I missed a warning from the kernel build system,
> and my toolchain doesn't actually support -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,
> so I'm not going to be able to test that further.
I dusted off a compiler that supports this, and ran the sample program under
Documentation with the above unproxify patch.
Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Thanks,
James
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: allow building with kcov coverage on ARM64
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:47:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576283B9.9050900@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160615142550.GA7971@leverpostej>
On 15/06/16 15:25, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:16:08PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I built and booted (via EFI) a kernel with this feature enabled (also
>>>>>> with the boot/Makefile change removed). I haven't tested the feature
>>>>>> itself as such, as I'm not sure how to do that.
>>>>> You can test it by running the test program from Documentation/kcov.txt.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, I hadn't spotted that. If I get the chance I'll try to give that a
>>>> go.
>>>
>>> I just had a go (with this applied atop of v4.7-rc3), and I get:
>>>
>>> root@ribbensteg:/home/nanook# ./kcov
>>> mmap: No such device
>>>
>>> The device exists (it was able to open the fd, evidently):
>>>
>>> root@ribbensteg:/home/nanook# ls -al /sys/kernel/debug/kcov
>>> -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 /sys/kernel/debug/kcov
>>>
>>> Strace show me:
>>>
>>> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/kernel/debug/kcov", O_RDWR) = 3
>>> ioctl(3, CHIOMOVE or CM_IOCGATR, 0x10000) = 0
>>> mmap(NULL, 524288, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
>>>
>>> It doesn't look like the error paths in kcov_mmap are hitting.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>> According to Dmitry (thanks, Dmitry!) this has regressed recently, but
>> there's a pending patch that should probably fix the problem:
>> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1605.2/04379.html
>
> Thanks for the pointer! With that applied, the program runs.
>
> However, it looks like I missed a warning from the kernel build system,
> and my toolchain doesn't actually support -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,
> so I'm not going to be able to test that further.
I dusted off a compiler that supports this, and ran the sample program under
Documentation with the above unproxify patch.
Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 16:57 [PATCH v2] arm64: allow building with kcov coverage on ARM64 Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-14 16:57 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-14 17:16 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-14 17:16 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-14 17:55 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-14 17:55 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-14 18:16 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-14 18:16 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-15 9:25 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 9:25 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 11:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 11:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 11:53 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-15 11:53 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-15 14:25 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 14:25 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 14:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-06-15 14:36 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-06-15 15:05 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 15:05 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-15 15:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-06-15 15:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-06-16 10:47 ` James Morse [this message]
2016-06-16 10:47 ` James Morse
2016-06-16 15:20 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-16 15:20 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-16 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-16 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-16 16:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-16 16:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-16 16:32 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-16 16:32 ` Mark Rutland
2016-06-16 16:36 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-16 16:36 ` Alexander Potapenko
2016-06-16 16:36 ` James Morse
2016-06-16 16:36 ` James Morse
2016-06-16 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-16 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576283B9.9050900@arm.com \
--to=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.