From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5][RFC] can: slcan: Replace sizeof struct can_frame with CAN_MTU Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:25:56 +0200 Message-ID: <5763C224.6090601@denx.de> References: <1465500064-5402-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <5c0b646c-f020-98d0-de88-0a604c62fddf@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:60159 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753967AbcFQJ0G (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:26:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5c0b646c-f020-98d0-de88-0a604c62fddf@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marc Kleine-Budde , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oliver Hartkopp On 06/17/2016 11:24 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 06/09/2016 09:21 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Use CAN_MTU macro instead of sizeof(struct can_frame) just like the >> other drivers do. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut >> Cc: Oliver Hartkopp >> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde > > Added this one to can-next. Thnaks, at least this one was a bit helpful. > Thnaks, > Marc > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut